A weekly window on the American political scene hosted by the Monitor's politics editors.

Peering through the partisan impeachment looking glass

AP Photo/Patrick Semansky
House members vote on articles of impeachment as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., stands on the dais, Wednesday, Dec. 18, 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Dear reader:

On Wednesday, Donald Trump became the third U.S. president ever to be impeached by the House of Representatives. It was, as the cable networks and scores of lawmakers keep informing us, a day for the history books.

And yet, the whole thing has felt somehow inevitable.

In part, that’s because there’s no suspense: It’s been pretty clear from the moment Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced an inquiry into the Ukraine matter that Democrats in the House would vote for impeachment – just as there’s no question that the GOP-controlled Senate will vote to acquit.

It also seems unlikely to change anything. Polls have shown very little movement throughout the process, with both sides dug in (though President Trump’s approval rating has ticked up slightly in the most recent Gallup survey).

Republicans charge that Democrats have been angling to impeach President Trump from the get-go – that they never could accept the outcome of the 2016 election and are trying to overturn the will of the people.

But while it’s true that some Democrats have long called for impeachment, party leaders certainly knew this process would not result in President Trump’s removal – would not overturn the election, in other words – and might even work against them politically. They say the president’s own egregious actions in this case forced their hand.

Still, many Democrats do believe President Trump is fundamentally unfit for office, in a way that puts him in an entirely different category than every other Republican president. If the Ukraine matter had never happened (or never come to light), it’s not hard to envision an impeachment process unfolding right now over something else.

What’s harder to envision is what will happen next. If an impeached-and-acquitted President Trump wins reelection next fall, how will Democrats respond? Or if he loses, will Republicans move to impeach the Democratic winner?

In a world in which the president can send out a six-page letter that one side views as a Unabomber-like tirade and the other compares to the Gettysburg Address, common ground seems increasingly hard to find.

Let us know what you’re thinking at csmpolitics@csmonitor.com.

Liz Marlantes, Politics editor

Programming note: As the 2020 campaign heats up, we will be sending out a bonus political newsletter! Starting in the new year, you’ll receive a second helping of insightful Monitor articles you may have missed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Peering through the partisan impeachment looking glass
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Watch/2019/1219/Peering-through-the-partisan-impeachment-looking-glass
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe