A weekly window on the American political scene hosted by the Monitor's politics editors.

Covington clash: Everyone’s got an opinion. Maybe that’s the problem.

An uncomfortable confrontation on the National Mall, caught on video, led to a social media frenzy this week. 

John Minchillo/AP
A counter-protestor drives by a gathering outside the Catholic Diocese of Covington Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2019, in Covington, Ky. The diocese in Kentucky has apologized after videos emerged showing students from Covington Catholic High School apparently confronting Native Americans outside the Lincoln Memorial after a rally in Washington.

“People who judge me based off one expression.... They’ve gone from there to … labeling me as a racist person, someone that’s disrespectful to adults – which, they’ve had to assume so many things to get there, without consulting anyone that can give them the opposite story.”
That was Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandmann, speaking on NBC’s “Today” about the infamous viral video  that showed him in a discomforting face off with a chanting Native American elder in front of the Lincoln Memorial. Over the weekend, critics rushed to condemn Mr. Sandmann’s “smirk” and other actions by his teenage classmates, who had traveled from Kentucky to Washington for an anti-abortion march.
But then, longer videos of the encounter emerged – showing a more complicated scene, involving other, more antagonistic-seeming protesters. Critics rushed to condemn the boys’ original critics, many of whom rushed to apologize. And then came a backlash to the backlash, as others argued that the boys’ behavior still shouldn’t be excused.
President Trump called the Covington students “symbols of Fake News.” And in a way (though not in the way he meant), he’s right – because the whole episode is symptomatic of a real challenge for both the media and our society at large.
“The nation’s culture is now enmeshed in a new technology that we don’t yet know how to control,” writes the New York Times’s David Brooks. “In this technology, a single moment is more important than a life story. In this technology, a main activity is proving to the world that your type is morally superior to the other type.”
There’s no question the “outrage machine” of social media lends itself to stereotypes rather than nuanced portrayals. It also tends to elevate small events – minor mistakes or instances of regrettable behavior by individuals who are not public figures – to the level of a national conversation.
Sometimes these conversations can result in good – if they lead to more tolerance and understanding of other viewpoints. But more often, it seems, everyone simply points fingers and moves on.
And the consequences can be severe. The boys' school has been forced to close temporarily and some of them have reportedly received death threats.
“In hindsight, I wish we could have walked away and avoided the whole thing,” Sandmann said. It’s advice those poised to jump into the online fray might heed as well.
Let us know what you’re thinking at csmpolitics@csmonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Covington clash: Everyone’s got an opinion. Maybe that’s the problem.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today