Speaking Politics phrase of the week: 'dead-cat bounce'

The phrase, suitably festive for Halloween, has gained currency in political circles to explain polling blips that don't mean anything.

Andrew Harnik/AP
Hillary Clinton might have been hoping for a dead-cat bounce in the South.

Dead-cat bounce: An all-too-vivid description of a brief recovery in otherwise declining poll ratings.

“Dead-cat bounce” is a common phrase in the investment industry; in conjunction with Halloween, Business Insider and other publications recently featured it as a “spooky” financial word.

“When a black cat crosses your path, it might mean bad luck,” wrote Alice Gomstyn of The Alert Investor. “But when a dead-cat bounce is before you, it might mean something good, albeit very fleeting: a temporary rise in share prices.”

Merriam-Webster dates its use from 1985 and says it is drawn “from the facetious notion that even a dead cat would bounce slightly from a sufficient height.” British lexicographer Susie Dent, in a new book, singled it out as particularly popular slang in UK banking circles.

But it’s also come up for years in connection with US elections. Earlier this month, The New York Times’s Nate Cohn looked at Hillary Clinton’s low support among white voters in Georgia and Louisiana: “No 'dead cat bounce' among Deep South whites,” Mr. Cohn said on Twitter.

Back in July, Daily Kos writer “Obama Amabo” assessed the potential that the GOP convention would help Donald Trump: “Ain’t gonna happen! In fact, it’s not even going to be the proverbial dead-cat bounce.” 

And a year earlier, Forbes contributor Aaron Kwittken speculated about Mr. Trump’s overall chances. “I think all of his recent traction is really just media hype around a cultural icon and will turn out to be a ‘dead-cat bounce’ for him — a short recovery followed by a downward trend, or spiral is what I predict in Trump’s case,” Mr. Kwittken wrote, advancing what was a widely accepted argument at that time.

In 1972, George McGovern’s miserable Democratic National Convention – when internal convention-organizing problems forced him to give his acceptance speech around 3 a.m. on East Coast time – “netted him a dead-cat bounce,” said University of Virginia analysts Larry Sabato, Kyle Kondik and Geoffrey Skelley. 

Sarah Palin was described as a dead-cat bounce candidate: She gave GOP nominee John McCain a brief shot of political adrenaline in 2008, but didn’t help him in the end. 

Chuck McCutcheon writes his “Speaking Politics” blog exclusively for Politics Voices.

Interested in decoding what candidates are saying? Chuck McCutcheon and David Mark’s latest book, “Doubletalk: The Language, Code, and Jargon of a Presidential Election,” is now out.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Speaking Politics phrase of the week: 'dead-cat bounce'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today