Speaking Politics phrase of the week: 'roll-off'

When voters vote for president but not for other races on the ballot, that's roll-off, and experts are wondering if it will be an issue with Trump voters. 

Charlie Riedel/AP
In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 21, 2016, Republican U.S. Rep. Kevin Yoder, second from left, talks with former Sen. Bob Dole during an event at the Johnson County Republican Headquarters in Overland Park, Kan. Democrats believe Yoder is vulnerable in his suburban Kansas City district because Donald Trump and the state's GOP governor are seen as unpopular there.

Roll-off: A political science term for when people cast a ballot in some races – such as president – but don’t bother voting in others.

Questions about the amount of roll-off at the polls are surfacing as experts try to assess how many Donald Trump supporters will turn out to back him, but choose not to express a preference for some or all other candidates or issues. 

Political scientists consider ballot roll-off an under-recognized but serious problem. Christopher Mann, a political scientist at New York’s Skidmore College who studies the issue, said that depending on the type of election – presidential, non-presidential or state and local races – roll-off rates can range anywhere from 5 percent to 20 or 25 percent. 

“Down-ballot roll-off is a hidden participation crisis in American representative democracy,” Mr. Mann said. “It generates surprisingly little attention, and I think that’s true because it’s difficult to research.”

The studies that have been done have assumed roll-off is deliberate and most likely can be explained by a lack of voter information. Mann also said voters who are faced with long ballots containing numerous ballot measures – such as in California – are more likely to roll off. 

Alienation from the electoral process is, of course, the other big reason. Some of Trump supporters’ deep anger “raises the prospect that some of these Trump voters will show up on Election Day, vote Trump, and spite some or all down-ballot Republican candidates by skipping these contests,” said Thomas Schaller, a political scientist at the University of Maryland-Baltimore County. “This would magnify the normal roll-off effect.” 

Mr. Schaller said it’s also possible that reliably Republican voters who dislike Trump might do the opposite – skip the presidential ballot, but vote for some or all other races. That would mean “lost votes for Trump at the presidential level and lost votes at the sub-presidential level for all other Republicans,” he said. “That is the disaster scenario for the GOP.”

Mann said the unpopularity of Hillary Clinton, compared with past candidates, as well as Trump could lead more voters than usual to leave the presidential line blank. 

The roll-off issue is drawing attention in the key swing state of North Carolina, where a federal appeals court recently struck down a controversial 2013 voter ID law. 

The ruling did leave intact a provision that eliminates straight-ticket voting – something that had been permitted since 1909. More than 40 percent of voters voted straight-ticket in 2010 and nearly 58 percent followed suit in 2012.

“We’re gonna see a lot more ballot roll-off this year, because of the lack of a straight-ticket option,” predicted Chris Cooper, head of the political science department at Western Carolina University. 

A separate, but related phenomenon is “drop-off,” or the decline in turnout between presidential elections and other electoral contests, such as congressional midterm elections, state and local elections for governor and other races.

Schaller said that drop-off can occur even during presidential years in states that hold post-November run-off elections, citing the 2008 race in which Georgia Sen. Saxby Chambliss failed to get the 50 percent majority needed to avoid a run-off, but then easily won in December because turnout was far lower.

Chuck McCutcheon writes his “Speaking Politics” blog exclusively for Politics Voices. 

Interested in decoding what candidates are saying? Chuck McCutcheon and David Mark’s latest book, “Doubletalk: The Language, Code, and Jargon of a Presidential Election,” is out now.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Speaking Politics phrase of the week: 'roll-off'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today