Political word of the week: pivot

The word is ubiquitous during campaign season, reflecting journalists’ growing usurpation of the lingo of political and media advisers.

Alex Brandon/AP
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton hugs Morgan Westbrook, who just graduated pre-kindergarten, as she arrive for a stop at Uprising Muffin Company Friday in Washington. Washington, D.C., holds the final primary Tuesday, after which candidates shift to the fall general election.

Pivot: A buzzword with a dual political meaning: A comprehensive change in campaign strategy, as well as the practice of ducking uncomfortable issues or questions by emphasizing something favorable.

We are in prime pivot season. Just look at the latest avalanche of articles about Donald Trump. The Wall Street Journal: “On Capitol Hill, Republicans Watch for Donald Trump’s ‘Pivot.’ ’’ And the Washington Examiner: “Trump Begins Pivot to November, Bashes Clinton, Warren.” Plus the Huffington Post: “No, Donald Trump Can’t ‘Pivot’ Away from Racism.”

Hillary Clinton is pivoting, too. Her sudden availability to the press, after months of avoiding reporters, led The Washington Post to wonder: “Hillary Clinton’s Media Pivot?” And the persistent controversy involving her use of a private e-mail server as secretary of State led to this from Politico: “Emails block Clinton pivot to positive.”

Why is it so ubiquitous? Brad Phillips, a former journalist who is now a media coach and observes politicians’ communications skills on his Mr. Media Training blog, said it reflects journalists’ growing usurpation of the lingo of political and media advisers.

“When I started Phillips Media Relations in 2004, not nearly as many ‘straight’ reporters were analyzing politicians through the prism of media training,” Mr. Phillips said. “My articles at that time had a unique angle – they assessed, with some specificity, the communications style of public figures rather than overarching political strategies. Fast forward a decade, it seems almost every blogger, pundit, reporter and tweeter sees the world as a media trainer does. They now speak a shared language, with terms such as ‘pivoting’ and ‘bridging’ and ‘optics’ and ‘gaffes’ pervading a surprising number of their stories.”

That’s irksome to NPR’s Scott Simon, who complained in a commentary last weekend that pivot “has become part of the special vocabulary of this campaign” and is not as clear in meaning as it could be.

“Saying ‘pivot’ instead of ‘change’ may not be wrong,” Mr. Simon said. “But the hundredth time you've heard it bounce off the echo chamber of pundits and analysts, it begins to smack of smug insider-ness. Imagine if Muhammad Ali, the masterful communicator who was laid to rest yesterday, had made his motto, ‘Pivot like a butterfly, sting like a bee!’’’

Its popularity also may spring from the fact that politicians themselves are invoking the word more often. Its use in House and Senate floor debates has spiked over the past decade, according to the Sunlight Foundation’s invaluable Capitol Words website. The word’s most frequent user: Kentucky’s Mitch McConnell (R), the Senate majority leader. (The overall use of “pivot” has been fairly consistent over the last century, according to Google’s Ngram Viewer.)

At the same time, the Obama administration has relied on “pivot” whenever it has sought to concentrate on addressing unemployment or other issues instead of whatever real or perceived scandal has been in the news.

“It feels like every couple of months I am reporting that the White House is announcing that they are pivoting to a jobs agenda, and something else happens,” observed Jake Tapper, then a White House correspondent for ABC News, in 2011.

Geoffrey Nunberg, a University of California, Berkeley, linguist and author of several books on language, said that in politics, as in basketball, successful pivoting has to be done with some subtlety.

“In both basketball and politics, the important thing is to keep one foot fixed while moving the other,” Nunberg said. “If you don’t, it’s traveling, which is viewed disapprovingly by both the refs and the public -- though in the latter case it goes by the name of flip-flopping.”

Chuck McCutcheon writes his “Speaking Politics” blog exclusively for Politics Voices.

Interested in decoding what candidates are saying? Chuck McCutcheon and David Mark’s latest book, “Doubletalk: The Language, Code, and Jargon of a Presidential Election,” is now out. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.