How to save the GOP from Donald Trump: Leave it to him

It might be time to start a new party and run hard against the Trump agenda. Let Jeb Bush run under the banner, 'Rational Republicans.'

Susan Walsh/AP
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump waves after speaking at the Republican Jewish Coalition Presidential Forum in Washington on Thursday.

Donald Trump has threatened that if the Republican Party doesn’t treat him nicely, he will leave it and run as an independent.

What if the Republican Party, instead, left him and ran independently? What would happen then?

Most pundits would immediately assume that Hillary Clinton would win in a walk.

But is that necessarily true?

Could, say, a Jeb Bush run under the banner of the Rational Republican Party?

How would he do?

Better than you might expect, I would venture to guess.

We do have some history of third-party insurgencies in this country. The latest serious threat to the two-party system came with Ross Perot, who did enough damage to George Bush I to propel Bubba Clinton to the White House.

Wouldn’t it be ironic if a three-way split would bring Jeb in instead?

Hillary is not the candidate that her husband was and, in many key ways, the electorate has changed.

Asian and Hispanic voters play a far more important role among the voting public than they did in 1992, and I contend that they are gettable with the right Republican candidate.

That candidate is not Donald Trump, obviously. But it could be useful to have Trump in the race for a Jeb Bush.

Trump gives Bush somebody to run against and that would make him seem more rational. It would better position himself with voters who actually want to get something done.

If Jeb ran as a rational Republican, he could actually say rational things and get away with it. He wouldn't have to kowtow to a base that seems to be in la la land these days.

He could acknowledge that we have to do something about climate change, which, if unchecked, will put Florida in serious jeopardy in a generation.

He could also press for trade policies that will isolate China and increase trade with many of our allies and competitors in Asia.

He could be practical and nonideological on issues like gay marriage.

And he could press for immigration reform.

And I venture to guess he would do well with a much bigger target audience than Republicans are targeting right now.

I include Asian and Hispanic voters in that group. They want immigration reform enacted into law and only one candidate will be able to fulfill that promise: Jeb Bush.

Hillary Clinton will not be able to deliver on immigration reform. Congressional Republicans won’t want to work with her on the issue. And she will likely overreach, making compromise impossible. Hispanic voters know in their heart that Hillary won’t be able to pass an immigration reform law, and they also know that Jeb Bush could.

Bush has the opportunity to define the rational Republicans as problem-solvers who can run the country with competence and a generally fiscally conservative approach to government.

Trump has morphed into George Wallace.

He is alienating everybody who is not a working-class white person. He is playing the race card, the refugee card, the politically incorrect card, the illegal immigrant card, the protectionist card, and any other card that can excite lower-income white folks and disappoint everybody else.

It might be a winning strategy to win the primary. It won’t be a winning strategy to win the general election.

But remember what happened to George Wallace. He won several states in the Old Confederacy, but lost the general election to Richard Nixon.

Many claim that Nixon’s Southern Strategy was what won it for him, but that’s not true, because Nixon lost the South.

Nixon won because he campaigned on ending the war in Vietnam, establishing law and order in our cities, and by governing not as a hardline conservative, but rather as a social moderate who cared about the environment and wanted to spur economic growth.

I don’t think that Jeb necessarily has to campaign as a social moderate, but I think he could be much more focused on issues other than abortion and gay marriage.

John Kasich and Chris Christie are going hard after Trump because they know how bad he is for the Republican brand. I am not sure if the brand will survive the daily barrage coming from the Donald and his partner, Ted Cruz.

And so, it might come time to part ways with a party that finds that somebody like Donald Trump is qualified to become president of the United States, and build something better and more rational.

It might be time to start a new party and run hard against the hatred spewed by the Donald.

It might be that the only way to save the party is to destroy it.

John Feehery publishes his Feehery Theory blog at

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How to save the GOP from Donald Trump: Leave it to him
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today