Veterans Day: Voters owe those who serve a wise commander-in-chief

Veterans Day is a holiday to remember the service of our veterans. It also should be a day to remember how and why wars happen in the first place. 

Butch Comegys/ The Times & Tribune/AP
A total of 6,857 U.S. flags are placed in memory of the men and women who lost their lives in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq on Monday,at the campus of Marywood University in Scranton, Pa. In background Joel Lesh of Lake Ariel, Pa., president of Marywood University's Student Veteran Alliance, and Brianne Henderson of Denville, N.J., a graduate assistant for Marywood University's Veterans Resource Center, look at a book listing the names of each of those honored.

There is no apostrophe in Veterans Day for a simple reason.

Our nation’s veterans don’t own the day. They don’t possess it.

On Veterans Day, we Americans honor all of those who serve or used to serve in our armed forces, living or dead.

Veterans Day is different from Memorial Day in that respect.

Memorial Day was adapted from the Civil War tradition in both the North and the South to decorate the graves of those who died in that gruesome war.

Armistice Day preceded Veterans Day.

At the 11th hour of the 11th day of November, from the years 1919 to 1939, most nations of the world took two minutes to remember those who fought in the Great War.

Ironically, in 1939, Great Britain moved that holiday to the weekend because it needed its factories to work full time to prepare for the coming war with Hitler’s Germany.

Over the next several years, there will be all kinds of centennials to mark the great battles of the First World War. We have already missed the opportunity to remember the utter stupidity, political miscalculation, and the blunders that first engulfed Europe and then the rest of the world in a conflict that slaughtered millions of people and brought global chaos and misery in 1914.

We like to remember fondly the sacrifices of the soldiers, but we tend to forget the bad decisions that put them in harm’s way in the first place.

Was World War I inevitable? Were the nationalist passions, convulsive technological change, and decaying government structures of the great and dying empires so toxic that war was the only result?

I don’t know.

What I do know is that we spend a lot of time and money trying to figure out how to win the next war. We don’t spend enough resources trying to avoid getting into it.

I have always been a big fan of Dwight Eisenhower, because alone among our modern presidents, he had the gravitas and wisdom to keep us out of unnecessary global conflict. He understood the true nature of war.

The world hasn’t gotten any safer since the dawn of modernization around 1914. Instead, you can make the case that it has gotten significantly more unstable, especially at the conclusion of the cold war.

During the cold war, two great powers, the United States and the Soviet Union, controlled the flow and duration of most conflicts; we now have mostly non-state actors, fortified by religious extremism, sowing conflict and creating instability.

Pax Americana, the idea that the United States enforces peace through strength, has lost favor in the Age of Obama, an era of deep defense cuts and foreign policy disengagement.

The upcoming contest will most likely pit two nonveterans against each other for a second consecutive presidential election. The last time that happened in America was during the Roaring ’20s; Herbert Hoover, Calvin Coolidge, Al Smith, and John Davis had no military experience in any capacity.

Lindsey Graham is the only presidential candidate left in either party who has any military service on his resume, and he just got dropped from the GOP undercard debate to be hosted by Fox Business on Tuesday.

The two top Republican candidates, if you believe the polls, not only have no military service, they don’t have any government service either. The GOP base seems to be channeling Charles de Gaulle, who once said that “politics is too serious a matter to be left to the politicians.”

But voting for either Donald Trump or Ben Carson is not an exercise in taking politics seriously. It’s an exercise in irresponsibility.

Veterans Day is a holiday to remember the service of our veterans. It also should be a day to remember how and why wars happen in the first place.

Carl von Clausewitz, the famous military strategist, once proclaimed: “War is the continuation of politics by other means.” But war is not inevitable. War happens when mediocre politicians make bad decisions.

It’s not enough to honor those who serve. We must all rededicate ourselves to voting for qualified and responsible leaders who will govern America and engage the rest of the world with wisdom born out of rich experience.

The stakes are too high to do anything less.

John Feehery publishes his Feehery Theory blog at

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Veterans Day: Voters owe those who serve a wise commander-in-chief
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today