Midterm blowout a 'poisoned chalice' for Republican Party? Hogwash.

Having control of both houses of Congress will only exacerbate and highlight the internal fractures within the Republican Party, some say. Hardly. A win is a win.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP
We're guessing that potential new Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell isn't secretly concerned that his party won Tuesday.

Even before this week’s blowout, some voices were saying that a Republican midterm victory would actually be a defeat. One pundit wrote that “winning the Senate and controlling both houses of Capitol Hill is a poisoned chalice for the GOP, one that will expose the party’s wide divisions and increasingly extremist views.”

Nonsense.  Power is like love:  it may involve heartache, but you are better off having it than not having it.

Of course, there will be debates and divisions within the party’s new Senate majority and its enlarged House majority. There were debates and divisions before. But majority parties are better able to manage internal disputes than minority parties. Among other things, they can set the agenda and structure floor votes in ways that hold their own ranks together while splitting the other side. That’s why majority parties generally have  higher party-unity scores than minorities.

Moreover, the 2014 election strengthened the GOP’s pragmatic wing. In this year’s primaries, party leaders helped protect incumbents against wacky challengers who either would have lost the general election or become embarrassments in Washington. The establishment also backed strong candidates to run for open seats and challenge Democratic incumbents.

In two years, Democrats will undoubtedly try to run against the Republican Congress. But they were going to do so even if they had held the Senate majority. That’s exactly what they did in 2012, when they had already controlled the Senate for six years. Over and over, President Obama used variations of this line: “But along with this Republican Congress, they've got a vision that doesn't say we work together; it says everybody is on their own.” (The apparent premise was that the GOP effectively controlled Congress by having a majority in the House and filibustering bills in the Senate.)

The 2016 election will be a challenge for Senate Republicans because they will be defending many more seats than the Democrats. But just imagine how much tougher their situation would be if the 2014 election had gone the other way. Disappointed contributors would be putting their checkbooks away, and demoralized incumbents would be making plans to retire in 2016. But with their victory, Republicans are in a much better position to raise money and persuade veteran lawmakers to hang on. And with 53 or 54 seats, they have some cushion against future losses.

No, their triumph is not a poisoned chalice.  A win is a win is a win.

Jack Pitney writes his Looking for Trouble blog exclusively for the Monitor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Midterm blowout a 'poisoned chalice' for Republican Party? Hogwash.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today