Panetta's pivot: why to expect more books from Clinton folks who worked for Obama

It's not easy to escape the gravitational pull of a collapsing presidency. Ask John McCain. The biggest danger to the Ready for Hillary juggernaut is Barack Obama.

Susan Walsh/AP/File
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta speaks during his last news conference at the Pentagon on Feb. 13, 2013. In a new book, Panetta, a former chief of staff in the Clinton administration, doesn't pull any punches in his criticism of President Obama.

The biggest danger to Hillary Clinton’s run for the White House in 2016 is not a challenge from the left in the primaries or a challenge from the right in the general election.

The biggest danger to the Ready for Hillary juggernaut is Barack Obama.

No, Obama is not going to run for a third term.

But the collapse of his second term could make it awfully hard for Hillary to make the case for continued Democratic dominance of the White House.

Clinton’s team is now thinking creatively about how to distance her from him.

Leon Panetta’s new book is one more step in that process.

Mr. Panetta, who once served as Bill Clinton’s chief of staff, didn’t pull any punches about the failures of the current president.

I suppose you can make the case that Panetta is just speaking truth to power, but the timing of all of this is more than a bit suspicious.

Joe Biden asked the relevant question: Why not wait until after Obama leaves office before you throw him under the bus?

To Biden, that makes perfect sense. But to Hillary, waiting until January of 2017 would be too late. She wouldn’t be able to carve out her own identity by then.

Handing over the baton in a third term is always a clumsy process.

Al Gore couldn’t get far enough away from Bill Clinton’s infidelities.

George Bush I called himself a kinder and gentler version of Ronald Reagan.

John McCain had no choice but to run against the Bush record, but that wasn’t enough to escape the gravitational pull of a collapsing presidency.

Expect more books from the Clinton folks who worked for Obama.

I can’t wait to read Rahm Emmanual’s book, which I am sure he will write after he gets reelected mayor.

John Feehery publishes his Feehery Theory blog at http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.