Mark Reis/The Colorado Springs Gazette/AP/File
Ben Carson greets a supporter during a book signing event in Colorado Springs, Colo., last month. He says he's considering running for president.

Ben Carson for president? Why a nonpolitician won't win.

Politicians are so unpopular these days that a nonpolitician like conservative hero Ben Carson might seem a natural choice for president. But it rarely works.

Carly Fiorina, the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard, is campaigning hard for Republican candidates this fall. News reports indicate that she might be  pondering a race for the White House in 2016.  And she is not the only nonpolitician who is eying the real estate at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Ben Carson, a famous surgeon and author who has a big following among Christian conservatives, has  started a political action committee that could be the launching pad for a presidential campaign.

Do they really think that they have a chance? It’s easy to see why. According to a recent survey,  79 percent of Americans are “somewhat dissatisfied” or “very dissatisfied” with the political system. They are disillusioned with both the executive and legislative branches of the federal government. Only 14 percent say that they have “high” or “very high” confidence in state officeholders, and members of Congress have the confidence of just 8 percent, one point below car salespeople. With politicians faring so poorly in the public eye, nonpoliticians might reckon that lack of background in elected office is actually an asset.

There’s just one hitch. Not since Dwight Eisenhower in 1952 have Americans elected a president or vice president without such experience. In the 62 years since, other electoral novices have sometimes sought the top job, but they have always fallen well short. There are good reasons for this pattern.

Running for office requires particular skills, and success in other fields does not necessarily carry over to the campaign trial. Consider retired Gen. Wesley Clark. On paper, he was a dream candidate: West Point valedictorian, Rhodes Scholar, combat veteran of Vietnam with a Silver Star, White House Fellow, commander in chief of the US European Command. But after he announced his candidacy for the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination, he bobbled questions that an experienced politician could easily have anticipated. Would he have voted for the Iraq War? "I don't know if I would have or not,”  he said. “Mary, help!” he called to his press secretary, when reporters bore in. “Come back and listen to this.” He got a little better over time, but never quite got the hang of presidential politics, and his campaign fizzled.

In other words, his résumé was great but he flunked the job interview.

Even very famous people are often unready for the scrutiny that comes with a presidential race. Billionaire H. Ross Perot had first gained national attention in 1969, when he tried to bring Christmas presents to American prisoners of war in Vietnam. In 1992, he initially got a great deal of support when he announced his campaign for the presidency as an independent. At one point,  he even ran ahead of both Gov. Bill Clinton and President George H.W. Bush. But then his eccentricities came to light, and he became unhinged. Among other things, he accused Republicans of a bizarre plot to disrupt his daughter’s wedding. He defiantly underscored his oddness with his choice of an official campaign song: Patsy Cline’s “Crazy.” Though he ended up with a substantial share of the popular vote, he did not win a single electoral vote. 

Presidential-level scrutiny can also turn up dirty laundry. In the 2012 campaign, former restaurateur  Herman Cain briefly led the field of GOP presidential candidates. He started to lose altitude as the debates showed that he knew little about issues other than health care. His campaign crashed when the press reported claims of sexual harassment and adultery.

In a 2016 campaign, Ms. Fiorina would have one advantage: Like Cain (who ran for Senate in 2004), she has sought office before. In 2010, she ran for the US Senate in California against Democratic incumbent Barbara Boxer. During a great year for Republicans nationwide, however, Fiorina lost by a million votes. Though no salacious bombshells exploded in that race, Democrats effectively used Fiorina’s corporate record against her, accusing her of  laying off thousands of workers while buying a yacht for herself. If she thinks that the “heartless rich person” theme has lost its potency, she should have a word with Mitt Romney.

Dr. Carson does not have a corporate record, but he does have a penchant for saying strange things. Earlier this year, for instance,  he claimed that the current state of our government is “very much like Nazi Germany.” When a candidate plays the Hitler card, many voters will think that he’s not playing with a full deck.

Perhaps an experienced politician would be the worst possible choice for a presidential candidate – except for the alternative.

Jack Pitney writes his Looking for Trouble blog exclusively for the Monitor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Ben Carson for president? Why a nonpolitician won't win.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today