Trump bumps up in poll. Time for Democrats to panic?

Democrats should refrain from taking to their beds with a pint of Chunky Monkey to binge-watch old Obama speeches.

Elaine Thompson/AP/File
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a rally in Lynden, Wash., earlier this month.

Donald Trump leads Hillary Clinton by 45 to 42 percent among registered US voters, according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday night. The survey’s margin of error is 3 percent, so it’s possible this matchup is a tie. But still – this is the second national poll this week showing Trump in front. Is it time for Democrats to panic?

Well, panic is always an acceptable response in presidential politics. That’s particularly true if your primary opponent won’t accept the fact that he’s lost and is threatening damage within your own party, and if your own favorability ratings are pretty bad.

But in terms of the Fox poll per se, Democrats should refrain from taking to their beds with a pint of Chunky Monkey to binge-watch old Obama speeches.

Just. One. Poll. We’re violating our own pundit standards just writing this story. Individual polls are just blips in the data stream of life. It’s possible Mr. Trump is gaining, and it’s also possible he isn’t. Averages of major polls are far superior indicators of the state of political races, and in those Mrs. Clinton leads by 2.7 percent (Huffington Post) and 3.3 percent (RealClearPolitics).

Maybe the Fox poll shows Trump has benefited from Republicans coalescing around his candidacy now that he’s the presumptive nominee. Maybe it shows that Trump been boosted because Jupiter is in alignment with Mars and the Wolf Moon is blue tonight. Narratives are hard to resist, but until there’s more indication about what’s happening, we should. Sometimes they’re just journalists assigning stories to random numbers.

Results may vary. Even a poll average squiggles up and down like a worm unless you smooth out the results with a general path. This is because polling is an art, not a science, and in the short term you’re just as likely to see polls rebound in the other direction as you are to see a trend continue.

“When the latest poll is much different from what came before, we’re likely to see a bounce back – not because of any deep political forces, but just because what we’re seeing is a sequence of noisy measurements,” writes Columbia University political scientist Andrew Gelman today in The Washington Post, making the point better than we can.

The bottom line: Poll charts are akin to a car with an inexperienced driver veering back and forth across the road, but never hitting a curb and proceeding in a general direction. So the next poll may show Clinton back ahead. Who knows?

Maybe a little panic. All that said, the data we have right now indicates generally that the election is going to be close. Polls are only part of it. There are what political scientists call the fundamentals: The economy is OK, but not great enough to boost the candidate of the incumbent party. Obama’s job approval ratings are not great, though they're getting better. US voters are generally reluctant to elect the same party to third consecutive White House term.

Democrats who think that a Trump versus Clinton election will be a walkover are fooling themselves. Maybe the Fox poll will help that sink in.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Trump bumps up in poll. Time for Democrats to panic?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today