Nikki Haley endorses Marco Rubio. Is that a big deal?

The South Carolina governor's endorsement is a boon for the Florida senator, but he's still got a long way to go with convincing voters he's authentic.

Chris Keane/Reuters
Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio autographs a campaign poster following a town hall at the Odell Weeks Activity Center in Aiken, South Carolina February 17, 2016.

South Carolina’s popular Republican Gov. Nikki Haley is going to endorse Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida for president at a Wednesday night rally, according to multiple news reports. With the Palmetto State’s GOP primary only three days away, is this a big deal?

Yes, yes it is. But by itself it may only help Senator Rubio survive, not leap into contention for front-runner status.

Governor Haley is a big prize, undeniably. She’s well liked in her state and has a national profile due to her response to President Obama’s State of the Union address. In that response she took obvious aim at Donald Trump by saying, “some people think that you have to be the loudest voice in the room to make a difference.” This earned her props from the establishment/donor class and other anti-Trump party elements.

And Rubio needs her backing. Until the most recent Republican debate he seemed to be emerging as the last, best hope of the establishment to counter the rise of Mr. Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas. Then Gov. Chris Christie (R) of New Jersey ripped him up for repeating memorized talking points. He dropped to fifth in the New Hampshire primary, just behind fellow Floridian Jeb Bush.

But Rubio’s risen to fight again in South Carolina. He seems a match for the state’s more conservative and religious GOP electorate, and current polls show him in a virtual tie with Senator Cruz for second place. Haley’s endorsement – plus the backing of two other prominent South Carolina Republicans, Sen. Tim Scott and Rep. Trey Gowdy – could bolster his chances for Saturday’s vote. Rubio needs a second or clear third place finish if he’s going to remain a viable candidate.

Rubio’s gain is also Mr. Bush's and Cruz’s loss. Both Bush and Cruz had hoped to win Haley’s backing for themselves. It’s a bigger blow to the former than the latter; the Bush family has long-established ties to Haley. George W. Bush even complimented her during his South Carolina campaign speech for his brother earlier this week, saying of the Indian-American, “Thank goodness our country welcomed her parents when they immigrated here.”

A decisive Bush loss in South Carolina could be the end for his campaign. That would be a big help for Rubio, knocking out a main competitor for establishment and party elite backing.

But Rubio has yet to completely shake the effects of his robotic debate response. He’s still dogged by opposition campaign workers dressed as robots. The larger flaw they point up is the nature of his appeal, or the lack thereof. Rubio remains a great candidate on paper – young, articulate, and well versed in foreign policy – but there’s something about him that has yet to click with real voters. Perhaps it’s a quality of rehearsed artificiality. Perhaps they just see him as too young.

Haley’s endorsement won’t overcome that. A second-place finish for Rubio in South Carolina would be a real accomplishment. But he’ll have to start winning states at some point to win the nomination. When’s that going to happen?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.