Is Marco Rubio making his move (finally)?

Many of Marco Rubio's closest supporters saw his early campaign as lacking focus, but they may have been misreading his intentions.

Patrick Semansky/AP
Republican presidential candidate Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florisa speaks in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

Finally, Marco Rubio may be making his move.

Friends and supporters of the Florida senator and GOP presidential hopeful have long worried that his campaign strategy seemed curiously passive. He wasn’t focusing money and personal appearances on any particular early voting state. Instead, Senator Rubio seemed content to let the other candidates mix things while he slowly built momentum, or tried to.

That might have been a misreading of Rubio’s intentions. It’s possible instead that his big worry was timing his efforts in Iowa and New Hampshire. You can peak too soon in primary politics, leaving you exposed to negative attacks from aggrieved rivals. Look what’s happening to Ted Cruz at the moment: the Texas senator, who leads in Iowa polls, is getting hammered by Donald Trump and others on the somewhat bogus question of whether he (Senator Cruz) is a natural-born citizen eligible for the presidency.

Meanwhile, Rubio has turned the dial on his own Iowa efforts up to “11.” He’s campaigned in the state four of the last five weeks. And he’s trying to dominate Iowa’s airwaves until the state’s Feb. 1 caucuses. Rubio’s campaign and a super political action committee that supports him are planning to run about one-third of all political ads scheduled in Iowa in coming weeks, according to a Des Moines Register analysis.

“For Rubio, who is in third place in Iowa with 12.6 percent support here, according to RealClearPolitics’ rolling average, being on TV could help keep him on the minds of voters and of the pundits who control the news cycle,” write Brianne Pfannenstiel and Jeffrey C. Kummer of the Register. 

Rubio’s task in Iowa is made easier by the fact that he probably does not have to win or even place second to meet the punditocracy’s electoral expectations. Cruz, the current Iowa front-runner, is a favorite of the state’s many conservative evangelical voters. The phenomenon of Trump is currently runner-up.

But Rubio may not be able to afford a fourth-place Hawkeye State finish. And he’d love to sneak up on Cruz by appealing to the nonevangelical conservative votes concentrated in Iowa’s urban areas.

In New Hampshire, Trump’s the front-runner, with 31 percent of the vote, according to RCP. Rubio is second, at 13 percent. But the Granite State is becoming more competitive, with Cruz and Jeb Bush trailing Rubio by only a few percentage points. Again, Rubio may not have to win here to gain momentum. But losing to Mr. Bush – or even a suddenly surging Ohio Gov. John Kasich – might prove fatal to the Floridian’s hope of becoming the establishment Republican alternative to Trump or Cruz.

One method Rubio is trying to convey momentum to the nation is using January as the month to rollout announcements of endorsements and other pledges of support. Some may be new; some may have been saved for the right moment.

“Presidential contender Marco Rubio is flooding the zone with endorsements and grassroots coalitions after keeping their existence under wraps for months,” writes David M. Drucker in The Washington Examiner.

Last Friday alone, Rubio announced an “expanded” leadership team in North Carolina, the backing of Iowa agricultural leaders, and pledges of support from 150 grass-roots leaders in South Carolina, notes Mr. Drucker.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.