Sarah Palin must love this Republican primary, right? You betcha.

Sarah Palin, grand dame of the tea party movement and pioneer of blue-collar Republican populism, looks over the Republican primary with satisfaction. 

Cliff Owen/AP/File
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Md., in this February file photo. This week, she was at the Republican debate in Las Vegas, Nev.

Perched on a stool at the Double Barrel Smokehouse in Las Vegas, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin surveyed the scene she had in some ways created.

Saddlng up in sparkly cowboy boots, she was here for the most recent Republican presidential debate, and the latest CNN poll had a decidedly Palin-esque flair. Donald Trump in first place with 41 percent of likely Republican primary voters. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas was in second with 14 percent. 

Both mavericks. Both purveyors of the brand of blue-collar Republican populism that she helped craft. 

But how did the grand dame of the Republican insurgency view a race that seems to have her ideological fingerprints all over it?

"I'm not going to pick one right now, but what a nice problem to have if it came down to Cruz and Trump," Ms. Palin said. "That's a good problem for voters to have, because we know that, as you say, they are both strong and very decisive and someone who would take the initiative. That is what we need today, and both of those candidates would fit that bill."  

The comment came as part of CNN's "Politics on Tap" – a discussion with host Jake Tapper billed as a lighthearted chat. And despite being more than 3,000 miles from her woodsy Wasilla home, it's no wonder she looked happy and at peace. Once a small town girl thrust into the national eye, she appears to be the same person she has always been: equally as relaxed holding a microphone or a musket.  

And now, she's not the only one with her sights fixed firmly on the Republican establishment. 

"There needs to be more of an exertion of independence from the candidates, and candidates not thinking that they need to be reliant on some kind of machine that is reliant on big donors essentially buying messages and buying votes," she advised. "Somehow the Republican Party has got to not marginalize someone like a Donald Trump, who is certainly the great example of being independent, but the Republican Party has got to convince the public that the candidate coming from our side of the aisle is running for the right reasons."

Mr. Trump and Palin seem connected, and in ways beyond rumors that he would offer her a cabinet position. They are bound by their ability to brand and blend their personalities into political popcorn: easy snacking, salty, digestive, ubiquitous.

She dodged hard-hitting questions, preferring to keep the chatter light and playful. It was also clear that she's still well-loved and admired as a voice of the conservative working class. Assembled admirers gushed afterwards about her warmth, eager for her to be back in political mix.  

In a recent appearance on Palin's Mama Grizzly Radio, Trump drew out the comparison: "She really is somebody who knows what's happening," he said. "She's a special person. She has a following that is unbelievable. Everybody loves her! Well, she's like me. She has people that don't exactly love us, and we understand who they are and you sort of forget about that. She has a tremendously loyal group of people out there for her. I think now more so than ever. I'm looking at some of these candidates. They like the Sarah Palin kind of strength you just don't see much of anymore." 

When asked about the prospect of Trump running as a third-party candidate, she pointed the blame on the Republican establishment for not treating him fairly and instilling fear in voters' minds, warning the Republican party "better not blow it!"

She defended him again when asked about his Muslim ban statement, noting that people need to be patient in hearing him out instead of "freaking out," she said. "I think that Trump was trying to finish the conversation that would lead to a pause on immigration in general, Jake. I think that's where he was going." 

She didn't clear up any rumors of her taking a potential cabinet position, although her daughter Willow blurted out "Trump!" when her mother was asked who she liked most.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.