Why it's time to start paying attention to 2016 election for real

It's not early out there anymore. Does this mean Donald Trump has a real chance?

Jay LaPrete/Reuters
U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a rally in Columbus, Ohio, November 23, 2015.

Wake up everybody! It’s time to push back from the leftover turkey and trimmings and pay attention to politics for real.

That’s because Thanksgiving is over. And Thanksgiving of the year prior to a presidential election, or a point shortly thereafter, is when Americans stop
fooling around and begin to make serious choices about which candidate they back.

This isn’t just an old pundits’ story, the sort of “truism” they relate on Fox/MSNBC when the shouting narrative lags. There is math that backs this up, particularly in regards to the key early voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire.

Run the numbers from past elections, and you’ll see that the predictive power of polls of Iowa and New Hampshire voters turns upward about a week and a half after Turkey Day, according to David Byler, an election analyst for RealClearPolitics. It steadily increases after that.

That means it’s about the day to stop dismissing those polls with a hand wave and the phrase, “It’s early yet.” It no longer is.

Does this mean Donald Trump has a real chance? He’s had a steady lead in New Hampshire since late July. He’d led in Iowa most of the way through that same period.

Not necessarily. Campaign time is not linear, as Nate Silver, prediction guru of the data site FiveThirtyEight, says. You don’t get a medal for each month you lead when it is a year-and-a-half out.

Ask Hillary Clinton about that. In 2007, she had a steady lead in Iowa through late summer and fall. Then she fell behind Barack Obama in December, about a month prior to the Iowa caucuses. He ended up winning the state, and eventually the White House.

Rudy Giuliani had an even worse reversal. He led national polls of Republican hopefuls for pretty much all of 2007. Then actual voting began. He lost both Iowa and New Hampshire (two states where his support had always lagged) and his support elsewhere quickly evaporated.

These analogies aren’t perfect, of course. Unlike Trump, Giuliani was vying to be the GOP establishment’s choice. Turned out, he wasn’t. Hillary Clinton is . . . not Donald Trump. In many, many ways.

So yes, The Donald has a chance. So far he’s been able to say pretty much anything without eroding his base of 25 to 30 percent support. Will that continue, particularly in Iowa and New Hampshire? Time will tell, starting about now.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why it's time to start paying attention to 2016 election for real
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today