Nebraska's rookie senator: 'A six-year term is a terrible thing to waste'

Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse took an unusual theme for his maiden speech: how to fix the US Senate. 

Ben Sasse for US Senate, Inc./YouTube/File
Sen. Ben Sasse (R) Nebraska walks with his family in a campaign advertisement for his US Senate. Sasse took an unusual theme for his maiden speech: how to fix the US Senate.

Like the historian and turnaround specialist that he is, rookie Sen. Ben Sasse (R) Nebraska spent his first year in the US Senate privately interviewing his colleagues, both Republicans and Democrats, trying to find out why the Senate is broken and how to fix it.

On Tuesday, in an unusual maiden speech, the newbie shared his findings, basically holding up the mirror to his colleagues. Even more unusual, a good number of them stayed to listen, from the Senate majority leader, to GOP presidential candidates Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, to a dozen-or-so Democrats.

The freshman from Nebraska – a former college president, not a politician, he emphasized – spoke with a winsome earnestness, revealing what so many in this body already know:

In private, hardly any of them considers members of the other party to be “evil or stupid or bribed.” And that, shamefully, they have allowed “short-termism and the sound-bite culture to invade” the chamber.

What the Senate should be doing is debating the big issues of the day that need solving – from the challenges of violent jihad to the need for entitlement reform. He rejected the view that the Senate simply reflects the polarization of the country, calling polarization beyond Washington “overstated.”

“The hundred of us should mitigating, not exacerbating, the polarization,” he said.

In a good-natured, yet serious way, he admonished senators for not doing the job that the chamber was designed to do – essentially throwing away the opportunity and breathing room that a six-year term provides for full debate and resolution of major issues.

Bluntly talking about the Senate's brokenness is not "naive idealism," said the boyish-looking senator, who is occasionally mistaken for a page. It's a necessary discussion, he said, because "a cultural recovery" in the Senate is needed for "a national recovery."

Senator Sasse expressed particular concern with executive overreach – but said part of the reason for this was because of “legislative under-reach.” Senators are not willing to lead or take hard votes, and so successive presidents of both parties “gobble up more and more power.”

“A six-year term is a terrible thing to waste,” he concluded, and judging from the response of his colleagues – a standing ovation – the senators seemed to agree. Sen. John Cornyn (R) of Texas, the No. 2 GOP leader in the Senate, called the speech “outstanding.”

“Thoughtful, pointed, constructive, needed,” said Sen. Chris Coons (D) of Delaware, who, already 40 minutes late to a meeting, had to fend off texts from his staff because he wanted to stay and hear Sasse out.

Will the Nebraskan's comments amount to a pebble thrown into a pool, creating a little ripple but nothing more as it sinks to silence?

“I seriously doubt that Senator Sasse will only throw a pebble,” said Senator Coons. “I suspect there will be a steady rain of little rocks.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Nebraska's rookie senator: 'A six-year term is a terrible thing to waste'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today