Edward Snowden says he'd accept jail in US. Coming home?

Edward Snowden’s public statement that he’s willing to go to jail might be an effort to restart discussions with the US over the terms of his return. 

Andrew Kelly/Reuters
American whistle-blower Edward Snowden is seen on monitors as he delivers remarks via video link from Moscow to attendees at a discussion regarding an International Treaty on the Right to Privacy, Protection Against Improper Surveillance and Protection of Whistleblowers in New York on Sept. 24.

Edward Snowden in an interview broadcast Monday reiterated that he’s willing to go to jail if US authorities allow him to return to his native country.

The former National Security Agency contractor told the BBC that he has “volunteered to go to prison with the government many times” but to this point has not received any official answer.

“So far, they’ve said they won’t torture me, which is a start, I think,” said the whistle-blower, who now resides in Russia. “But we haven’t gotten much farther than that.”

Mr. Snowden said he and his lawyers are waiting for the US to call them back.

Is it possible that Snowden and the Justice Department could strike some sort of plea deal? After all, his return could be a good thing for the government and even US intelligence, in some ways.

For one thing, a plea deal would presumably stop Snowden’s leaks. Right now he continues to make public bits of classified information from his Russian outpost. As far as the NSA is concerned, he’s still an embarrassment and a security risk.

For another, NSA experts might get a chance to debrief him and find out how much he really has, and who he gave it to. That could help them understand the fuller implications of Snowden’s moves on US national security.

Finally, a managed Snowden return might be popular. Snowden’s revelations about the extent of NSA activities have fueled worldwide discussion about the nature of privacy versus safety in the digital age, and he’s become a hero to many. A recent Pew poll shows that 52 percent of Americans are at least somewhat concerned about government surveillance of their data and electronic communications.

One sign of his standing with the public: A petition to pardon Snowden at the online White House petition site has received more than 167,000 electronic signatures in two years.

But this does not mean there’s a national consensus on the nature of Snowden’s actions. About 46 percent of respondents to that Pew survey said they were not very concerned about US electronic snooping.

Many in the US intelligence community remain adamant that he’s a traitor who should be tried in a court of law. That remains the official White House position. Responding to the petition for clemency, Lisa Monaco, the president’s adviser on Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, said that Snowden “should come home to the United States, and be judged by a jury of his peers – not hide behind the cover of an authoritarian regime. Right now, he’s running away from the consequences of his actions."

Nor has Snowden detailed exactly what sort of prison term he’s willing to accept. A few months? Years? Currently, he faces charges under the Espionage Act which could send him to jail for three decades. It’s hard to envision him returning to endure that kind of sentence.

What does he want? That’s the first thing Brookings Institution national security legal exert Benjamin Wittes asked Snowden after the whistle-blower joined Twitter last week.

“What would it take in terms of an understanding with [the Justice Department] for @Snowden to return to the United States?” Mr. Wittes tweeted at Snowden.

Snowden’s public statement that he’s willing to go to jail might be an effort to restart discussions that died out in 2013, some months after he fled the US. It’s possible he thinks it could be a propitious time to reach out. After all, in March former Army general and Central Intelligence Agency director David Petraeus avoided jail by pleading guilty to a single misdemeanor in a classified leaks case. Mr. Petraeus admitted that he had provided a lover with notebooks of secrets, and then lied about it to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The fact is, however, that Snowden’s infractions were of a different scale than those of Petraeus, and were made in public. He published reams of US secrets for all to see. The Obama administration has been tough on other leakers and there is no reason to believe the current president will make an exception for Snowden.

“The realistic scenario is that he’s going to be in exile in Russia for a long time to come,” wrote The Guardian’s Ewen MacAskill, who worked with Snowden on his initial 2013 information leaks, in March.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Edward Snowden says he'd accept jail in US. Coming home?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today