The 2016 race just got stranger: Trump says he can win Latino vote

'Hispanics love me,' Trump said Wednesday morning. 'I will win the Latino vote because I'm going to bring jobs back into our country.'

Andrew Shurtleff/The Daily Progress/ AP
Republican presidential hopeful Donald J. Trump talks to reporters during the grand opening of the Albemarle Estate at Trump Winery Tuesday, outside Charlottesville, Va., July 14.

Donald Trump is in a hole and he won't stop digging.

Weeks after his controversial campaign launch speech, in which he labeled Mexican immigrants "rapists" and "criminals," Trump hasn't exactly backed quietly away

He has talked about building an impenetrable wall to stop Mexicans from entering the country.

He has tweeted, "I love Mexican people but Mexico is not our friend. They're killing us at the border and they're killing us on jobs and trade. FIGHT!"

It was enough to repulse at least some of his 2016 Republican rivals.

"My party is in a hole with Hispanics – the first rule of politics when you’re in a hole is to stop digging," fellow GOP hopeful Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said following a speech in Washington last week. "And somebody needs to take the shovel out of Donald Trump’s hand."

But Trump hasn't apologized for any of his comments. In fact, he's still digging.

"The Hispanics love me," Trump told Fox News Wednesday morning, adding, "I will win the Latino vote because I'm going to bring jobs back into our country."

It's not the first time he's said that.

"I have a great relationship with the Mexican people ... I have many legal immigrants working with me. And many of them come from Mexico. They love me, I love them," Trump told NBC News last week. "And I'll tell you something, if I get the nomination, I'll win the Latino vote."

He echoed his theme over the weekend, when he told a crowd in Los Angeles, "When it's all said and done, I will win the Hispanic vote. I will win the Hispanic vote because I'm going to create jobs."

National Latino figures dismiss his claims.

"Trump’s comments that he would win the Latino vote are laughable," Luis Miranda, former Obama White House spokesperson, told Forbes.

"Trump is just the GOP’s anti-immigrant flavor of the month," added Pablo Manriquez, DNC hispanic media director.

Perhaps more perplexing than his claim is that his anti-immigrant rhetoric isn't hurting him in national polls. It may even be helping.

He's leading all other Republican contenders in a USA Today/Suffolk University survey that has him at 17 percent support, compared to former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush's 14 percent.

And a CNN/ORC poll named Trump, who on June 16 called Mexican immigrants "rapists," the second-best Republican candidate at handling illegal immigration, after Governor Bush.

Why is he doing so well?

Amid an extremely large field of Republican candidates, Trump has leveraged his celebrity and the anti-immigrant controversy to stay in the headlines and climb the polls, which reward name recognition early on in races.

But it might not last.

"Bashing Mexicans might give Donald Trump a short-term political bump," Politics Voices contributor John Feehery writes for the Christian Science Monitor, "But long term, that kind of rhetoric is politically disastrous for the Republican Party and bad for the country at large." 

That's because Hispanics comprise a key demographic for winning elections. Their numbers in the US are expected to reach 63.5 million by 2020, according to the US Census Bureau. And while an estimated 11 percent of all eligible voters are Latinos, only 26 percent of registered Latino voters identify as Republican, according to the Pew Research Center.

The GOP didn't do well with the Hispanic community in the 2012 presidential election, when Latinos voted for President Obama over Republican Mitt Romney by 71 percent to 27 percent, according to Pew.

"As a party, we should reject what he says because it's not true, and if we don't reject it, we've lost the moral authority, in my view, to govern this country," Senator Graham told CNN on Sunday. "If we don't, we will lose, and we will deserve to lose."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.