Jeb Bush launches 'Right to Rise' PAC. What does name mean?

Jeb Bush announced on his Facebook page that he’s filed paperwork to form a 'leadership' political action committee, Right to Rise. The name, harking back to the late Jack Kemp, may signal the type of campaign the former Florida governor plans to run.

Susan Walsh/AP
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, center, recites the Pledge of Allegiance before giving the keynote address at the National Summit on Education Reform in Washington, Nov. 20. According to a December poll conducted by CNN/ORC, the former governor has pulled ahead of the potential presidential contender pack.

Jeb Bush really is going to run for president, isn’t he? That’s the implication of today’s Bushworld news: The former Florida governor announced on his Facebook page that he’s filed paperwork to form a “leadership” political action committee. That will give him a legal way to raise money and hire staff in advance of an official campaign declaration.

“Right to Rise” is the new PAC’s name. Mr. Bush is using the same title for a second entity, a super PAC that will be able to receive truly large donations that ostensibly aren’t supposed to be used for direct electioneering. There’s no word yet on how (or if) these two organizations will work together.

So where did this name come from? That’s our question. It’s a bit out of the mainstream of PAC monikers. Most of them tend to be bland, even vague. This one seems to fulfill a descriptive purpose.

Bush himself has given us a road map here: He says it’s from Rep. Paul Ryan (R) of Wisconsin. It’s supposed to recognize the right of everybody to pursue economic freedom and happiness.

But its real roots might stretch back to the late Jack Kemp, the former pro football quarterback, congressman from New York, and 1996 GOP VP candidate. Bush has pointed to Kemp as a political role model for “right to rise,” as well.

“The name of the PACs reflects the developing theme of Bush’s possible campaign,” writes Robert Costa at The Washington Post. “An admirer of the late New York Republican Jack Kemp, whose politics revolved around poverty issues, Bush is hoping to cast himself as a new kind of Republican, in the Kemp mold, by touting his ideas on economic empowerment.”

If that’s true it’s an interesting peek at Bush’s (possible) campaign-to-come. Kemp was a combination of moderate Republican – he emphasized outreach to minorities, and spoke often about the need to fight poverty – and economic conservative. Tax cuts were his big thing. He was an original Reagan-era supply-sider who insisted that lowering tax rates would pay for itself in increased economic activity.

“Jack was a compassionate man and an ideas man,” said Jeb Bush in a 2013 speech at a Jack Kemp Foundation event. “It is interesting we find ourselves as a party and a movement and as a nation confronting many of the same policy challenges Jack predicted and presented solutions to decades ago – from immigration to private sector growth to education reform.”

In practical terms, this might mean that Bush is not going to tack right on immigration or education to try and please conservative primary voters. Kemp favored immigration reform in his day, for example.

And Bush has already pretty much indicated that he still supports Common Core educational standards.

The mission statement of the Right To Rise PAC notes it stands for giving “all children a better future by transforming our education system through choice, high standards and accountability.”

So Bush is trying to frame himself as a happy middle-of-the-road warrior. Whatever he’s doing, it’s got him in the lead for the Republican nomination: At this point he’s about six points ahead of his challengers in the RealClearPolitics rolling average of major polls.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.