Rudy Giuliani links President Obama to anti-cop hatred: Tough talk or too far?

In the wake of the NYPD shootings this weekend, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani says President Obama helped create an anti-police backlash.

Damian Dovarganes/AP
Lawyer and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani speaks at a press conference in Los Angeles on Oct. 16. Mr. Giuliani lambasted President Obama Sunday fueling perceptions of a racially-biased policing that the former mayor says helped spur the execution-style killings of two New York police officers.

Did anti-police propaganda from President Obama and other Democrats create a political climate that resulted in the weekend murder of two New York City police officers?

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and some other Republicans are making that provocative charge. If nothing else, the allegation seems sure to heighten the national debate about Ferguson, Mo., and stoke relations between the police and minorities to a new level of intensity.

“It’s a pretty safe bet that issues of race and police will gain even more immediacy in the days and weeks ahead,” noted Aaron Blake at the "The Fix" political blog of The Washington Post on Monday morning.

As a mayor, Mr. Giuliani was a staunch law-and-order politician who defended police and fought back against New York City’s rising crime rate. Now he says that protests of police misconduct in regard to the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson and Eric Garner in Staten Island have fueled a national climate that led to the execution-style killings of New York police officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos.

Here’s Giuliani on Fox News on Sunday describing this belief at length:

“We’ve had four months of propaganda starting with the president that everybody should hate the police,” Giuliani said. “The protests are being embraced, the protests are being encouraged. The protests, even the ones that don’t lead to violence, a lot of them lead to violence; all of them lead to a conclusion: The police are bad, the police are racist. That is completely wrong.”

He’s not the only voice on the right saying this. At the conservative National Review Online this morning Peter Kirsanow makes a similar assertion even more forcefully.

“The responsibility for the shootings in New York rests with the shooter,” writes Mr. Kirsanow. “But the responsibility for the worst racial climate in two generations lies largely with the demagogues in our nation’s leadership who are too busy whining about the horrors of being mistaken for a valet to do the hard work of confronting the country’s toughest challenges.”

The “valet” phrase there is a reference to Mr. Obama, who noted in recent interview with People Magazine that he’s been mistaken for a waiter and a car valet on occasion at black-tie events.

This assertion of blame is far from universal on the right. Others say it goes much too far to blame individual criminality on a vague collective climate of hate.

But there’s a double standard at work here, some conservatives say, as Democrats charged that a climate of hate from Republicans such as Sarah Palin led to the shooting former US Representative Gabby Giffords.

“Every group, of course, has some bad actors. But we should be on guard against developing bigoted responses that apply to groups instead of individuals,” writes Mollie Hemingway at The Federalist.

Democrats and those further left on the political spectrum have reacted differently to these statements from Giuliani and others. Some say they’re outraged that Giuliani in particular has linked Obama with any irresponsible rabble-rousing, given that Obama, in their view, has made nothing but mild and fact-based racial references since the Ferguson riots began.

There’s a reason Giuliani et al. don’t actually mention any of Obama’s actual words when making their charges, adds Paul Waldman at The Washington Post’s left-leaning "Plum Line" blog. That’s because they’d undercut the assertion, according to Mr. Waldman.

Every time he’s spoken about these recent racial issues, Obama has stressed that violence of any kind is unacceptable, even in response to legitimate grievances. In every public statement he includes praise of the police, says Waldman.

Polls show racial issues are weighing on the minds of the public, both blacks and whites, as much as they have in decades. That’s one undeniable result of Ferguson and related incidents. Giuliani’s words show how far apart the sides are in their perceptions of the problems underlying this situation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Rudy Giuliani links President Obama to anti-cop hatred: Tough talk or too far?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today