Chuck Hagel out as defense secretary. Bad fit from beginning?

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel has submitted his resignation to President Obama less than two years after assuming the post, according to media reports.

Cliff Owen/AP
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel testifies before the House Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Sept. 18. Administration sources say that Defense Secretary Hagel is resigning from President Barack Obama's Cabinet.

Chuck Hagel is out as secretary of Defense, according to news reports Monday morning. He’s resigning under pressure, or in other words, getting fired with a bit of dignity.

But just a bit. Secretary Hagel’s relatively short tenure at the Pentagon implies that he never really fit in with the White House and its vision for national security. A nominal Republican, a former US senator from Nebraska, and an Army enlisted man, Hagel struggled during his confirmation hearings in the face of tough questions from GOP lawmakers such as Sen. John McCain (R) of Arizona. For example, he managed to avoid offering a direct answer as to whether he believed the “surge” of US troops into Iraq in 2007 was a success, but only with difficulty.

His exit with two years to go in the Obama presidency validates the questions Republicans raised about his competence at the time, say critics.

“What’s ironic in how WH apparently going after Hagel is they’re justifying resistance to his confirmation by Senate Rs,” tweeted David M. Drucker, senior congressional correspondent of the right-leaning Washington Examiner.

Brought in to preside over a drawdown of US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan, Hagel instead has dealt with the explosion of the Islamic State insurgency and the need for a renewed American effort in the region. Presumably the Obama administration has decided it needs someone with a different demeanor and focus to deal with the job of conducting that operation.

But it’s not fair to Hagel to blame him for the missteps and slow start to the current IS fight, say some commentators. He worked in an environment where the White House holds decisions closely and gathers power to itself.

“Blaming Hagel for the failures of war policy is akin to blaming George for the breakup of the Beatles,” tweeted Bloomberg View columnist Josh Rogin.

Hagel submitted his resignation on Monday and President Obama accepted it quickly, according to the Associated Press. Hagel plans to remain in office as long as it takes for the Senate to confirm his successor.

Will that be a long wait? That’s a key question, as some in the GOP are pushing for Republican senators to block all administration nominations in the wake of Obama’s announcement of unilateral action deferring deportation of up to 5 million undocumented immigrants.

It’s possible the GOP will treat the Pentagon post a bit differently than others. Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas said as much over the weekend, indicating that key national security positions won’t face a hold on nominations.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.