Navy SEAL on Fox: Still claiming he shot Osama bin Laden?

Former Navy SEAL Robert O'Neill opened up to Fox News about his role in the take down of Osama bin Laden. His details about SEAL Team Six's preparations for the raid are almost as compelling as the debate over who delivered the fatal shot.

Walter Hinick/The Montana Standard/AP
Robert O’Neill a former Navy Seal team member, poses Dec. 20, 2013 in Butte, Mont. O'Neill, a retired Navy SEAL who says he shot bin Laden in the head, publicly identified himself Nov. 6, amid debate over whether special operators should be recounting their secret missions. Mr. O'Neill spoke out about the operation in an interview with Fox News Tuesday.

The former Navy SEAL who claims he killed Osama bin Laden went public Tuesday night. Fox News broadcast the first of a two-part series based on interviews with Robert O’Neill, a key member of the SEAL team that assaulted the Al Qaeda leader’s Pakistani hideout in 2011.

Is Mr. O’Neill backing off his insistence that he was the person who fired the actual fatal shots? Nope. That does not appear to be the case, though the editing of the Fox News team left him a little wiggle room.

At the top of the show, reporter Peter Doocy asked him directly what it was like to kill Bin Laden.

“It wasn’t real. It was another guy in the house that we shot. It didn’t sink in. It didn’t sink in for a while,” said O’Neill.

O’Neill’s claim of responsibility here has roiled the secretive world of US special operations forces. Others who took part in the raid have given slightly different accounts of the event, with shots coming from as many as three SEALs. O’Neill was the second man charging the room where Bin Laden was hiding, and others say the first man may have killed the Al Qaeda mastermind before leaping at two women in case they carried explosives.

O’Neill has reacted to this criticism with a kind of shrug. In a separate interview broadcast on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360° over the weekend, he said, “The most important thing that I’ve learned in the last two years is to me it doesn’t matter anymore if I am ‘The Shooter.’ The team got him.”

It’s possible the former SEAL has more to say about this aspect of the raid. The Fox piece revealed a bit about the actual encounter with Bin Laden at the beginning of the show, then moved back in time and covered his early life, training, and other SEAL exploits. It ended just as SEAL Team Six boarded the helicopters that would carry them to the Bin Laden raid.

And really, does this matter? In terms of the dramatic impact of last night’s broadcast, it certainly doesn’t. There was enough interesting detail about the life of a SEAL and O’Neill’s personal experience that whether or not he actually pulled the fateful trigger seems almost beside the point.

O’Neill said that the more the SEALS trained for the Bin Laden mission the more they came to believe that it would be one-way. They would not come back. Either Bin Laden would trigger a suicide explosive belt, or the house would be booby-trapped and explode.

But either way, Bin Laden would not survive, either.

“It was worth it,” O’Neill remembers thinking.

He wrote letters to his children to be opened only upon his demise, telling him he loved them. (He shredded them when he returned safe.) Just before he boarded the helicopter, he called his father, and told him goodbye and thanks for everything. His father sat for 17 minutes in a Walmart parking lot after hanging up, emotionally distraught.

Fox is set to show the second part of the interview this evening. Presumably it will cover more details of the actual operation.

Should the former Navy SEAL have gone public at all? That’s a larger issue. O’Neill’s not the first SEAL on the raid to try and profit from his presence. Colleague Matt Bissonnette wrote a book, “No Easy Day,” under a pseudonym. Higher-ups such as former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta have published memoirs that include their reminiscences of the Bin Laden operation.

Pentagon officials cooperated with the producers of “Zero Dark Thirty”, the Hollywood thriller about the raid released in 2012.

Still, SEALs are expected to keep their mouths shut, writes veteran Time military correspondent Mark Thompson. They sign non-disclosure agreements. Selflessness is supposed to be part of the special operations ethos.

And they are only the tip of the spear. Hundreds of other personnel, from intelligence analysts to military technicians, work behind the scenes to support SEAL exploits.

“If fame, and the fortune it can bring, become part of the allure of signing up with US Special Operations Command, the men and women who actually make those missions possible are going to sour on their private sacrifice,” writes Mr. Thompson. “The net result will be a less-capable force.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.