Chris Christie wasn't on midterm ballot. Big winner anyway?

Christie helped the Republican Governors Association raise a record-breaking $106 million for this election cycle. By his own count he visited 37 states to campaign, including 19 in the last five days.

Mel Evans/AP
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie steps from the voting booth after voting Tuesday in Mendham Township, N.J. As chairman of the Republican Governors Association, Christie campaigned across the country for others and raised a record $106 million for GOP races.

Was New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie a big winner in yesterday’s midterm elections? He wasn’t on the ballot but lots of other Republican governors and gubernatorial candidates were, and Governor Christie, chairman of the Republican Governors Association, was instrumental in some of their victories.

That’s earned him gratitude and favors for a probable 2016 presidential run.

“He certainly has raised the bar,” said RGA executive director Phil Cox of Christie’s efforts. “He said from the start that this was his only political priority this ear . . . electing and reelecting Republican governors. And the results speak for themselves.”

Christie helped the RGA raise a record-breaking $106 million for this election cycle, according to the New Jersey Star Ledger. That money came in handy for some cash-strapped candidates, such as Larry Hogan in Maryland. Hogan was outspent 4-to-1 by Democrat Anthony Brown – and still won in a deeply blue state.

Christie also showed up lots of places in person. By his own count he visited 37 states to campaign, including 19 in the last five days. Stops included a round-up of states important in presidential politics, from Florida (Republican Rick Scott won reelection) to Wisconsin (ditto for the GOP’s Scott Walker) and Michigan (Rick Snyder, another Republican incumbent, another win).

“It gave me some experience in terms of traveling around the country . . . It just gives you a feel for what that life might be like,” said Christie this morning on ABC.

With “that life,” Christie’s referring to a presidential bid, in case you didn’t get it. He made the rounds of all the major televised morning shows on Wednesday to crow a little and promote the Christie brand. He told all who asked that it is now time for him and his family to sit down and “start to think about this stuff.” He sounded very much like somebody who has already made up his mind to run for president, unless his prospects take a sudden downturn and it appears like it might be a waste.

In that sense, he’s the GOP equivalent of Hillary Rodham Clinton. They’re both campaigning now. They reserve the right to stop if they change their mind, but that doesn’t appear likely.

But he’s unlike Mrs. Clinton in another sense: he’s far from the foreordained frontrunner. Christie’s earned a lot of return help from important state officeholders, but he still has to work on the voters themselves.

Just look at this recent ABC/Washington Post poll: only 24 percent of respondents agreed that Chris Christie would make a good president. Forty-six percent said he would not.

In that same survey, 51 percent said Clinton would make a good chief executive. Forty-one percent said she wouldn’t.

To be fair, other possible GOP candidates did not fare much better in this one poll. But it shows that Christie still has a ways to go if he is to shake off the “bully” image that’s dogged him since the bridge-gate scandal, in which Christie aides diverted traffic in Fort Lee, N.J., as a means of political retaliation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.