Why new Jeb Bush 2016 hint may really indicate he's running

What's interesting about the latest hint that Jeb Bush is giving 'serious thought' to running is its timing. Mr. Bush is reaching the point where it's time to start tamping down his supporters’ enthusiasm if he’s leaning towards no-go.

LM Otero/AP/File
George P. Bush (r.) reacts as his dad, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R), gives a fist pump during an interview in Abilene, Texas. The younger Bush said in an interview with ABC's 'This Week' Sunday that his dad is 'moving forward' on a potential 2016 White House run.

It’s looking more likely than ever that Jeb Bush will run for president in 2016.

Supporters of the former Florida governor have said for months that Jeb is seriously considering a White House bid. And on Sunday we got the hardest bit of evidence yet that Bush may jump in: His son, George P. Bush, told ABC’s “This Week” that dad is giving “serious thought” to running.

“If you had asked me a few years back, I would have said it was less likely,” said the younger Bush, who is himself running for land commissioner in Texas.

True, this isn’t close to a definitive statement. The serious-thought-to-running formulation is the way Jeb Bush himself has been talking about the White House for some time. Jeb has come across as truly reticent about the demands of a campaign. While he’s out campaigning for GOP candidates prior to the 2014 midterms, he hasn’t been nearly as ubiquitous as, say, Hillary and Bill Clinton.

But time is rushing onward. We’re reaching the stage in the 2016 invisible primary where it’s time for Bush to start damping down his supporters’ enthusiasm if he’s leaning towards no-go.

After all, one of the main purposes of signaling you might run is to keep party donors and campaign workers from committing to other candidates. Those folks may feel cheated if they wait too long and Bush never gets on the bus. This could spread ill-will towards Jeb in particular and the Bush family in general.

Plus, 2016 might be Jeb’s best shot. The establishment wing of the Republican Party doesn’t yet have an obvious champion – hence all the talk about resurrecting the Mitt Romney candidacy. Hillary Clinton is the likely Democratic candidate, which could cancel out the family dynasty issue in a general election.

“Democrats have been ‘ready for Hillary’ since the day Obama won re-election. Now, even George P. Bush’s statement on Sunday, Republicans have to start asking themselves whether they’re ready for Jeb,” writes Tom Bevan, co-founder and executive editor of RealClearPolitics.

That said, Bush faces obvious hurdles to winning the Republican nomination. He’s to the left of much his party on immigration. He has supported Common Core educational standards, which are anathema to many conservatives in the GOP. In 2012, he indicated he would consider supporting a national fiscal package that included tax hikes, if it also had substantial budget reductions. If there’s anything that unites Republican factions, it’s opposition to increased taxes under virtually all circumstances.

Given all this, it’s clear he’d face substantial opposition within his own party.

“Woke up hoping this Jeb Bush stuff was just a dream,“ tweeted Mollie Hemingway, senior editor at the right-leaning publication The Federalist, on Monday morning.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.