Joe Biden's two-gaffe day: Offensive or simple slips of the tongue?

Vice President Joe Biden has already apologized for one of the gaffes, but the other caused many pundits to characterize him as the nation’s slightly dotty uncle, somebody who will say whatever pops into his head.

Charlie Neibergall/AP
Vice President Joe Biden speaks to reporters during a stop at the Waveland Cafe, Wednesday, Sept. 17, in Des Moines, Iowa.

Has Joe Biden become America’s gaffe-prone intemperate uncle?

That question arises because the vice president of the United States on Wednesday had what some pundits are calling a two-gaffe day.

To be fair, the first misspeaking occurred on Tuesday, during a speech at the 40th anniversary conference of the Legal Services Corp. When speaking about his son Beau’s attempts to help members of the military straighten out problem loans, he referred to “shylocks” taking advantage of vulnerable service members.

This refers to Shylock in Shakespeare’s "Merchant of Venice," a Jewish moneylender. In the play, the character is greedy and ruthless, and the name has come to be an anti-Semitic slur.

Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), complained about Mr. Biden’s use of the S-word, saying it represents a “medieval stereotype” and “an offensive characterization.”

At the same time, Mr. Foxman praised Biden as a friend of the Jewish community and a “tolerant individual.” And on Wednesday, Biden apologized.

“Abe Foxman has been a friend and advisor of mine for a long time. He’s correct, it was a poor choice of words,” Biden said in a statement.

Then on Wednesday, Biden stepped in it again, using a term that some might consider offensive. Speaking at a rally for campaign finance reform in Iowa, he talked about meeting Lee Kuan Yew, former prime minister of Singapore, calling him “the wisest man in the Orient.”

The terms “Orient” and “Oriental” are anachronistic and offensive to many Asians, as they seem to refer to a past world of exotic mystery conjured up by Hollywood as opposed to real life.

This caused many pundits – but particularly those on the right – to characterize Biden as the nation’s slightly dotty uncle, somebody who will say whatever darn thing pops into his head. After all, in the past he’s gotten in trouble for saying it helps to have an Indian accent when walking into a convenience store. He’s promoted shotguns over rifles as a means for self-defense and once referred to Barack Obama as “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

“It’s like the Class of 1950 buried Joe Biden under their high school and said ‘Open in 2014,’ ” tweeted right-leaning CNN "Crossfire" host S.E. Cupp.

Well, maybe. But consider the way Biden handled the S-word flap. He apologized quickly. And ADL national director Foxman approached him in the first place as a friend of the Jewish community who had made a mistake.

That’s one reason Biden does not get into more trouble than he does for his words: Many of the affected groups and/or individuals figure Biden is actually on their side. After all, Mr. Obama picked Biden for his vice president after Biden had made his “articulate and bright” statement.

Plus, Biden gets away with his loose-phrases approach to speechmaking partly because he’s become less politically important as the end of the Obama administration approaches.

Let’s face it: Biden is not going to even be a serious player for the Democratic nomination in 2016 if Hillary Rodham Clinton runs. Yes, it’s early, but he’s 54 percentage points behind her in national polls of Democratic voters, according to RealClearPolitics.

He’s second in a list of potential Democratic candidates only due to name recognition. If for some reason Ms. Clinton stops running, the race will be thrown into chaos, and other Democratic contenders will quickly emerge. Biden has run for president twice, and Democratic voters showed little interest in either race. Third time is not the charm in that context.

Still, there are some who think the old liberal mainstream media double standard is covering up Biden’s offenses.

“If Biden were a Republican people would be calling for his resignation,” tweeted Daily Beast political reporter Olivia Nuzzi.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.