Republican says 'hundreds' of Americans have joined Islamic State. True?

The number of Americans who have joined the Islamic State is unclear. The figure cited Sunday by Rep. Mike Rogers might be high, some groups say, but there are 'legitimate concerns about this issue.'

J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File
Rep. Mike Rogers (R) of Michigan, seen here leaving a press conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, said Sunday that he wants President Obama to take decisive action against the growing threats from Islamic State militants on US soil.

Have hundreds of disaffected Americans traveled overseas to train as terrorists with the brutal Islamic State?

That’s what Rep. Mike Rogers (R) of Michigan, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said on Sunday during an appearance on Fox News. He said that IS foreign fighters – Canadian and British citizens, as well as Americans – now pose “a very serious threat” to US interests.

IS, also known as ISIS and ISIL, has focused on seizing slices of Syria and Iraq to create what it calls a new Islamic caliphate. But Representative Rogers said that an attack on a Jewish museum in Brussels in May was likely led or inspired by IS members and may show the group is eager to attack Westerners where they live.

“I’m very concerned, because we don’t know every single person that has an American passport that has gone and trained and learned how to fight,” said Rogers.

Clearly some Americans have indeed joined the IS ranks. A US citizen named Douglas McCain died fighting with IS troops in Syria last month. Other Americans have turned up among IS battlefield casualties. The question is the scale of this trend – and whether it poses a threat to the US homeland as well as US interests in the Middle East.

In July, Attorney General Eric Holder said “dozens” of Americans were present in IS units. In total there are some 7,000 foreign IS fighters, out of a total strength of 23,000 operating in the Syria-Iraq axis, according to US intelligence estimates.

This matches up with the estimates made by some knowledgeable groups outside government.

Last December an extensive survey of credible sources by the Center for the Study of Terrorist Radicalization at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies judged the most likely number of foreign fighters in IS to be about 8,500.

Of those, only a scattering were Americans or Canadians, according to the Center, which is based at Kings College in London.

However, Western Europeans made up almost 20 percent of the foreign fighter population in Syria at that time, according to the Center figures. The largest contingent, between 63 and 412 individuals, came from France. Second was Britain, with a range of 43 to 366. Third was Germany, with 34 to 240.

Back in June, Rogers framed the threat somewhat differently. In a Fox News appearance then he said that “thousands of Westerners and Americans” are fighting with IS in the Middle East.

Politifact.com rated this statement “mostly true.” While the “Americans” part of that statement might have been stretched, according to the Pulitzer-winning fact-checking web site, it’s undeniable that disaffected Westerners are flocking to a group they see as making progress towards its extremist goal of a radical Islamic-run state.

“Rogers may have amplified the numbers a bit, but he did not overstate the threat. Experts we spoke with, along with US and Western governments, have expressed legitimate concerns about this issue,” wrote Politifact.com in June.

Right now there is bipartisan dissatisfaction with President Obama’s approach to IS. Rogers opined that Obama’s foreign policy is in “free fall”. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) of California, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Sunday on “Meet the Press” that Obama has been “too cautious” in confronting the group.

Obama travels to Wales for a NATO summit this week where he may push to persuade other nations to join the US in a more concerted effort to roll back IS gains.

As to the IS threat to the United States itself, doom-laden worry about them crossing the US border is alarmist and unhelpful in developing a realistic strategy to defeat the group, according to Daniel Benjamin, a senior fellow in foreign policy at the Brookings Institution.

“Even if marauding [IS] operatives in Land Cruisers may be humiliating Iraq’s hollowed-out military, that doesn’t mean they have genuine terrorist skills ... we’ve seen no demonstrated ability to carry out the kind of complex international strike that kills dozens or hundreds, let along engulfs a US city in flames,” wrote Benjamin in mid-August.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.