Sarah Palin may want Obama impeached, but most Americans don't

Establishment Republicans are no fans of President Obama, but many are not eager to rile independents and rouse the Democratic base with impeachment proceedings just before midterm elections.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
President Obama speaks about the economy and talking cars of the future at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center in McLean, Va., Tuesday. Despite disaffection with the president's handling of the country, there's little interest among Americans or even on Capitol Hill in impeaching him.

Why don’t more top Republicans talk about impeaching President Obama? To see why House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio and others believe it would be bad politics, just look at two new national polls, whose results indicate that impeachment talk could hurt the GOP as it tries to regain control of the Senate in the 2014 midterms.

For instance, a new Rasmussen survey finds nearly twice as many voters oppose as support impeaching Mr. Obama and removing him from office. The split is 58 percent to 32 percent, with 10 percent not sure.

A majority (56 percent) say it would be bad for the Republican Party to even launch an impeachment effort, according to Rasmussen. Fifty-five percent say it would be better to elect an opposition Congress to counter Obama’s actions.

A Huffington Post/YouGov survey, released this week, has broadly similar results. While Americans tend to believe that Obama has exercised authority beyond the constitutional limits for the executive branch, only 32 percent believe he should be removed from office, according to YouGov results. Sixty-eight percent say he should not be impeached and booted from the Oval Office.        

One striking aspect of both these polls is the partisan split. Fifty-eight percent of Republicans want Obama impeached, according to Rasmussen’s results, while 87 percent of Democrats and 52 percent of independents want him to remain in office. YouGov’s numbers are close to those.

Given the support for impeachment among Republicans, why doesn’t the House GOP at least give it a try?

For one thing, many top establishment Republicans, for all they dislike Obama’s actions in office, don’t see that he has committed impeachable offenses. For another, they know they need independent voters – and maybe some disaffected conservative Democrats in purple states – to win enough seats to retake the Senate in November. Mounting an impeachment effort could turn off those voters, while angering the Democratic base and driving more true-blue Democrats to the polls. Given the gravity of impeachment, it could split the nation into angry partisan camps, as during the impeachment of President Bill Clinton.

At their monthly “Conversations with Conservatives” luncheon, six of the House GOP’s leading conservatives rejected impeachment for these and other reasons, writes Sarah Mimms Tuesday in The National Journal.

“If you want to help the Democrats keep control of the Senate, this would be the right way to do that,” said Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R) of Kansas, referring to an impeachment push.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.