Political independents rarer than many think, poll suggests

A new poll offers evidence that the trend toward increasingly polarized US politics may be a stronger tidal pull than the desire to stand independent from the parties.

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File
The US Capitol is seen from the Cannon House Office Building in Washington in this file photo. A new poll finds that 29 percent of voters chose their political party mainly because of dislike of the opposing party.

Americans love to grouse about politics in general and political parties in particular. But a new Associated Press-GfK poll reveals the complexities behind many claims of independence: The vast majority of US voters, when pushed, line up with either Democrats or Republicans. Truly unaffiliated citizens are rare.

As a matter of personal identity 32 percent of Americans describe themselves as Democratic, according to the AP survey. Twenty-six percent say they are Republican. Twenty-one percent say they are independent from both parties.

But when self-described independents are asked an additional question – whether they lean one way or the other – a further slice of them peels off toward partisanship. Including these leaners, 43 percent of US voters are Democrats, and 34 percent are Republicans. That’s a total of 77 percent of the nation. Only seven percent describe themselves as truly independent of either party. (The rest simply answer “none of the above” when given those choices.)

This does not mean voters are enthusiastic about their party choice. Nor does it mean they automatically support Democratic or Republican policies – although in many cases, they do.

Their party, rather, is an aspect of personal identity. Some like Republican, or Democratic, candidates. Others simply say they’ve been Democratic, or Republican, for as long as they can remember. For a small slice of Americans, it’s about anger: 13 percent of Republicans say they picked their side because they dislike Democrats more than anything else, according to the survey. Sixteen percent of Democrats say they line up on the left due to dislike of Republicans.

The bottom line here is that the trend toward increasingly polarized US politics may be a stronger tidal pull than the desire to stand apart from the parties. As Dan Balz, chief correspondent of The Washington Post, points out in a recent piece, almost 90 percent of voters now vote straight party tickets. Very, very few will jump back and forth and cast voters for Democrats and Republicans on the same ballot.

“The percentage of true independents may be only about 10 percent of the electorate,” Mr. Balz writes.

Furthermore, those at the middle between the parties may be the least-informed of voters – not highly knowledgeable citizens who pick and choose their votes on pure reason. Balz cites data showing that those in the middle are less active politically, and less publicly engaged overall, than those on the left or right.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Political independents rarer than many think, poll suggests
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2014/0707/Political-independents-rarer-than-many-think-poll-suggests
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe