Does new poll show Democrats might keep control of Senate?

A just-released poll shows Democrats tied with or leading Republicans in key red state Senate races, boosting morale on the left. But it's a bit early for election forecasting models to pay much heed.

|
Timothy D. Easley/AP/File
Kentucky Democratic Senate candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes speaks in Louisville, Ky., in 2014. NBC/Marist data survey has Grimes within a percentage point of Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell in Kentucky.

Might Democrats keep control of the Senate following this fall’s midterm elections? That question is reverberating through Washington political circles Monday following the surprising numbers of a just-released NBC/Marist poll of key red state 2014 Senate races.

The survey shows Democratic candidates even with or ahead of Republican rivals in Kentucky, Georgia, and Arkansas. If nothing else it’s been a morale boost for left-leaning partisans after months of electoral bad news.

“Today’s new polling is a reminder that maybe, just maybe, all the GOP certainty about their pending Senate takeover is a bit premature,” writes liberal Greg Sargent at his Plum Line Washington Post blog.

For instance, NBC/Marist data survey has Democratic challenger Alison Lundergan Grimes within a percentage point of Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell in Kentucky. Given Kentucky’s Republican lean, many observers have felt that Senator McConnell is the heavy favorite in this race.

In Georgia, the poll puts Democrat Michelle Nunn about even with all possible Republican opponents. That has Democrats dreaming of the return of the Nunn clan to the US Capitol – Ms. Nunn’s father, Sam Nunn, served in the Senate for a quarter century.

And the survey puts incumbent Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas – one of the most endangered Democrats on most pundit lists – a whopping 11 points ahead of GOP challenger Tom Cotton.

All the above “are competitive states as far as the general election is concerned,” says Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion in Poughkeepsie, N.Y.

Well, that’s probably true. But it’s still way too early to put too much credence in these numbers. Individual polls don’t tell you that much this far in advance of statewide elections.

Lumping NBC data in with previous polls, the RealClearPolitics average of major surveys has McConnell ahead by one percentage point – essentially tied.

In Georgia, RealClearPolitics has Nunn up by three percentage points. And in Arkansas, it has Senator Pryor up by 4.8 points – meaning the big 11 point lead he enjoys in the NBC poll may be an outlier.

And election forecasting models at this point in the cycle don’t put much credence in poll numbers, if they include them at all. Other factors such as incumbency, candidate quality, the state of the economy, and national trends weigh more in early-stage political prognostication.

Those models have barely budged, in case you’re interested. At the New York Times, their Upshot Senate election model gives the Republicans a 54 percent chance of retaking the chamber. That’s essentially a tossup.

Other math-based forecasts give close to the Upshot’s results – with the exception of the Washington Post’s Election Lab, which has the GOP as 82 percent favorites to gain Senate control.

The bottom line: don’t get too excited about each day’s headlines, one way or another. There are lots of headlines and potentially election-changing events to come.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Does new poll show Democrats might keep control of Senate?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2014/0512/Does-new-poll-show-Democrats-might-keep-control-of-Senate
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe