David Ortiz might have ended the presidential selfie, White House aide says

A White House aide says that President Obama was not pleased at having his selfie with Boston Red Sox hitter David Ortiz used in a Samsung marketing campaign. It might be the 'end of all selfies.'

Carolyn Kaster/AP
Red Sox slugger David Ortiz takes a selfie with President Obama, holding a Boston Red Sox jersey presented to the president during a ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington Tuesday, where the president honored the 2013 World Series baseball champions.

David Ortiz, it appears, has left his mark on political history. This week, he may have killed the presidential selfie.

Ever since the World Series champion Boston Red Sox visited the White House Tuesday, with Ortiz snapping a self-portrait with President Obama on his smartphone, D.C. has been set to vibrate. Ortiz, it turned out, had a social media deal with Samsung, and the Korean phonemaker said in statement after Ortiz tweeted his photo: “When we heard about the visit to the White House, we worked with David and the team on how to share images with fans.”

Yes, that would be the president unwittingly shilling for the Galaxy Note 3 smartphone. The White House was not pleased. 

Now, White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer said on CBS's "Face the Nation" Sunday: "Maybe this will be the end of all selfies. [Obama] obviously didn’t know anything about Samsung’s connection to this."

At this rate, Doris Kearns Goodwin could add an entire selfies chapter in a retrospective on the Obama presidency. In December, it was the president who was criticized for taking a selfie – with the prime ministers of Britain and Denmark at the memorial service for Nelson Mandela in South Africa.

For the president who has essentially invented the political social media playbook, there is some irony in all this.

Obama has certainly embraced the power of Twitter to promote his image. His selfie in South Africa at the time set a record on Twitter for the most retweets. But comedian Ellen DeGeneres broke that record last month with a selfie she took at the Oscars with actors including Bradley Cooper, Meryl Streep, Brad Pitt, Kevin Spacey, and Jennifer Lawrence.

When Obama later appeared on Ms. DeGeneres’s talk show, “Ellen,” he quipped: “I thought it was a pretty cheap stunt myself – getting a lot of celebrities in the background, you feeding them pizza.”

The DeGeneres selfie, appropriately enough, was also coordinated by Samsung as a promotion for the exact same device Ortiz used.

For his part, Ortiz has defended himself, saying the photo was not part of a marketing ploy.

“I don’t understand where that stuff is coming from," he told The Boston Globe. “That was one of those things that just happened. I gave him the jersey, and the photographers were going to take their pictures and I thought, really at the last second, maybe I should snap a shot with my phone while I have the chance ... It had nothing to do with no deals.”

Alex Radetsky, whose Radegen Sports Management represents Ortiz, insisted to Mashable that "it certainly was not part of the [Samsung] deal. It was spontaneous on his part."

As for the White House? Mr. Pfeiffer, at least, apparently did think the photo was a pretty cheap stunt.

 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.