Obama on 'Funny or Die': Would JFK, Reagan have done Web comedy?

Veteran presidential adviser David Gergen tweeted Wednesday that many presidents wouldn't have appeared on a talk show on the Funny or Die website, as President Obama did this week.

Video screen capture from YouTube

Would John F. Kennedy have appeared on “Between Two Ferns”? David Gergen doesn’t think so. The veteran presidential adviser and cable commentator tweeted on Wednesday that it is “unimaginable” that Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, or Reagan would have appeared on the satirical “Ferns” talk show on the Funny or Die website, as President Obama did this week.

“They carefully protected majesty of their office,” Mr. Gergen tweeted.

Well, maybe. It’s certainly true this bunch was clear about the demands of the office for a certain formality. Truman fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur for disrespecting the authority of the president. Eisenhower – an experienced leader – got furious with people who wasted his time. Kennedy wore expensive clothes and made speeches with rhetorical flourishes that sometimes seemed translated from Latin. Reagan wore a suit coat in the Oval Office as a sign of respect for the presidency itself.

Some of them would never have appeared on “Ferns” under Mr. Obama’s circumstances. Republicans Ike and Reagan wouldn’t have backed a new national health-care mandate, meaning they would not have needed to go on TV to push young people to sign up.

But c’mon, “majesty”? All modern presidents have known that they need to strike a balance between projecting strength and humanizing their office. And they are human, after all. Truman publicly threatened physical damage to a critic who ripped his daughter’s singing. Eisenhower appeared on “The Colgate Comedy Hour,” a pioneering TV show hosted by comedians Abbott and Costello, who themselves were no more dignified then “Ferns” host Zach Galifianakis.

Kennedy ... OK, we’re not sure he would have traded barbs with a star of “Hangover.” He’d have sent Frank Sinatra or Sammy Davis Jr. to do the job. The old movie and TV pro Reagan would have loved it, though, if it weren’t about expanding the government’s role in health care. He did comedy bits with his old pal Bob Hope after winning the Oval Office. And of course, he famously appeared with a monkey as a co-star during his Hollywood days.

What’s maybe more interesting about Gergen’s tweet is the fact that there are presidents he skipped. What about LBJ? Yeah, he’d have done it, but the host would not have gotten a word in edgewise. President Nixon’s not mentioned because he famously appeared on the sketch show “Laugh-In” during the 1968 campaign. He uttered one of the show’s signature lines: “Sock it to me.”

Bill Clinton talked about his underwear on MTV. Given that context, “Two Ferns” would have been just a morning’s work. George W. Bush appeared on the game show “Deal or No Deal,” hosted by that well-known policy analyst Howie Mandel.

We don’t mean to pick on Gergen here: Lots of others had the same opinion. On Fox News, Bill O’Reilly opined that Abe Lincoln would never have done what Obama did. During Tuesday’s daily press briefing at the White House, ABC News’s Jim Avila asked whether Obama had damaged “the dignity of the office.”

“No,” replied presidential spokesman Jay Carney. “We obviously assess opportunities that we have and look at whether or not they’re going to be successful and wise, and I think we made the right call here.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.