Michael Grimm resignation: why Speaker Boehner is cheering

Rep. Michael Grimm (R) is resigning effective Jan. 5, after insisting he would stay in Congress despite a guilty plea to felony tax evasion. On Monday, he had a conversation with Speaker John Boehner.

Stephanie Keith/Reuters
Representative Michael Grimm of New York is photographed ahead of a news conference following his guilty plea at the Brooklyn federal court in New York, December 23, 2014.

Rep. Michael Grimm (R) of New York may best be remembered for threatening to throw a reporter off a balcony in the Capitol and “break [him] in half” after last January’s State of the Union address.

But it was felony tax evasion, to which he recently pleaded guilty, that proved to be Representative Grimm’s political undoing. Late Monday night, he announced he was resigning from Congress, effective Jan. 5.

“I do not believe that I can continue to be 100 percent effective in the next Congress, and therefore, out of respect for the office and the people I so proudly represent, it is time for me to start the next chapter of my life,” Grimm said in a statement.

The resignation represents a victory for House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio, even though Grimm’s Staten Island seat could potentially go to a Democrat in a special election. In the 114th Congress, which begins Jan. 3, Republicans will control both houses of Congress and are under pressure to show they can govern effectively.

Grimm’s outsize persona and legal problems have been a distraction for his party, though he won reelection easily in November. Even after his guilty plea last week, Grimm had insisted he would not resign his seat. But on Monday, Speaker Boehner had a conversation with Grimm, and within hours the New York congressman announced his resignation.

During a hearing last Tuesday, Grimm pleaded guilty to one count of aiding in the filing of a false tax return, and he is expected to serve some months in prison. Short of treason, a member of Congress convicted of a felony is still allowed to serve. But under House rules, a member convicted of a felony may not vote in committee or on the floor. The ban is lifted once the member is reelected, but in Grimm’s case, the rule would have left his district effectively unrepresented for two years.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) has yet to call a special election, but both parties have already been looking at potential candidates. On the Republican side, District Attorney Daniel Donovan was seen as a strong prospect, but the decision of a grand jury not to bring an indictment in the chokehold death of Eric Garner harms Mr. Donovan’s chances. Donovan was the lead prosecutor in the case.

Other GOP possibilities include state Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis and state Sen. Andrew Lanza.

On the Democratic side, one prospect is former Rep. Michael McMahon, who lost to Grimm in 2010. Another possibility is state Assemblyman Michael Cusick. Both are conservative Democrats.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Michael Grimm resignation: why Speaker Boehner is cheering
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today