Obama set to limit power plant carbon emissions. GOP pushes back

On Monday, the EPA is expected to set the first carbon pollution limits on existing US power plants. In this ongoing fight with the GOP, President Obama is emphasizing health benefits.

|
Matthew Brown/AP
In this July 2013 photo, smoke rises from the Colstrip Steam Electric Station, a coal burning power plant in Colstrip, Mont. The Obama administration is set to limit carbon emissions from US power plants.

President Obama and Republicans are about to butt heads – again – over carbon emissions, climate change, and the impact on the US economy. Not to mention the health of future generations of children.

On Monday, the administration through the EPA is expected to set the first carbon pollution limits on existing US power plants. Until now, such limits applied only to new plants.

States must come up with plans to reduce emissions by such means as cap-and-trade systems and deriving increased energy from renewable sources.

"This is a colossal proposal that should achieve the biggest carbon pollution reductions ever undertaken by the United States," Daniel Weiss of the left-leaning Center for American Progress told USA Today. "No president has ever proposed a climate pollution cleanup this big."

In fact, the proposals are in line with what’s already happening in some parts of the country.

“Nearly a dozen states are already implementing their own market-based programs to reduce carbon pollution,” Obama said in his weekly radio address Saturday. “And over 1,000 mayors have signed agreements to cut their cities’ carbon pollution.”

Speaking from the Children’s National Medical Center, rather than from the White House as usual, Obama emphasized the health benefits of reducing carbon emissions.

“In just the first year that these standards go into effect, up to 100,000 asthma attacks and 2,100 heart attacks will be avoided – and those numbers will go up from there,” he said. “As President, and as a parent, I refuse to condemn our children to a planet that’s beyond fixing.”

White House officials have been fanning out across Washington and the country to build support and reassure those concerned about the coming rules, the Associated Press reports. Among those worried: a number of Democrats from conservative areas who have openly criticized the rules as they prepare for difficult re-election fights this fall.

Obama will echo his argument that the rules will benefit public health during a conference call Monday organized by the American Lung Association and other health groups.

Republicans, meanwhile, are dusting off their arguments against what they see as draconian environmental regulations harmful to the economy.

"We all want clean air and clean water," Sen. Mike Enzi of Wyoming (a major coal-producing state) said in the weekly GOP address. "We don't want costly regulations that make little or no difference, that are making things less affordable. Republicans want electricity and gas when you need it, at a price you can afford."

“The Administration has set out to kill coal and its 800,000 jobs. If it succeeds in death by regulation, we’ll all be paying a lot more money for electricity – if we can get it,” Sen. Enzi said. “Our pocketbook will be lighter, but our country will be darker."

Obama rejects such arguments.

"These excuses for inaction somehow suggest a lack of faith in American businesses and American ingenuity,” Obama said.

“The truth is, when we ask our workers and businesses to innovate, they do. When we raise the bar, they meet it,” he said. “When we restricted cancer-causing chemicals in plastics and leaded fuel in our cars, American chemists came up with better substitutes. When we phased out the gases that depleted the ozone layer, American workers built better refrigerators and air conditioners. The fuel standards we put in place a few years ago didn't cripple automakers; the American auto industry retooled, and today, they’re selling the best cars in the world, with more hybrids, plug-in, and fuel-efficient models to choose from than ever before.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama set to limit power plant carbon emissions. GOP pushes back
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2014/0531/Obama-set-to-limit-power-plant-carbon-emissions.-GOP-pushes-back
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe