Debt ceiling 101: 12 questions about what's going on

The US Treasury has warned that as early as Oct. 17 it will no longer be able to cover all the government's rising financial obligations. If the government wants to keep paying all its bills, Congress must allow the Treasury to borrow more money – in other words, raise its debt limit.

Therein lies the rub. Many Republicans are uneasy with America's fiscal path and want to use this moment to address it (as well as other issues). Most Democrats say a debt ceiling deadline is too important to hold "hostage" to political horse-trading. We say it's a complicated topic that could use a little explanation.

Here’s your guide to the debt limit deadline and its implications.

Brian Skoloff/AP
A sign at the south entrance to Grand Canyon National Park, Ariz., indicates the park is closed as Congress remains deadlocked over federal government funding.

1. What is a debt ceiling, exactly, and how high is it now?

Andy Nelson/The Christian Science Monitor/File
President Clinton's fiscal year 2001 budget was the last to yield a budget surplus. The rest didn't go quite according to plan.

It’s a Congress-imposed cap on the amount of money the US Treasury can borrow from two sources. The first is “debt held by the public,” mainly Treasury bonds owned by investors in the US or in other nations. The second is “intragovernment” debt, which happens when the Treasury borrows from another government account that has a surplus, such as Social Security.

Since May, the debt limit has been set at $16.7 trillion.

Borrowing is needed when there aren’t enough tax revenues to cover all federal spending. And for decades, the trend has been that Congress arranges for the government to spend more than it takes in as tax revenue. Budget surpluses have been rare.

In September the Department warned that another hike is needed or the Treasury won’t have funds to cover all Congress-ordained spending.

1 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.