Might Chris Christie put a Democrat in Frank Lautenberg's Senate seat?

New Jersey Sen. Frank Lautenberg's passing Monday gives Gov. Chris Christie a juicy opportunity to help Republicans cut into the Democratic majority in the Senate. But one can't rule out that he'll name a Democrat. 

J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D) of New Jersey walks in the Capitol in Washington in this 2012 file photo. Senator Lautenberg, a multimillionaire New Jersey businessman and liberal who was called out of retirement for a second tour of duty in Congress, has died at age 89.

The passing of five-term Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D) of New Jersey marks the end of an era. He was the oldest member of the Senate, its last World War II veteran, and a beloved figure among New Jersey Democrats.

It also deals a potential political blow to President Obama. Under New Jersey law, the governor appoints a replacement to fill a Senate vacancy until the next general election. That means Gov. Chris Christie – a Republican – has a juicy opportunity to turn a Democratic seat Republican during a crucial legislative period. Immigration reform is on the line this summer. The Democrats would still control the Senate, though by a narrower margin, 54 to 46.

It’s just one seat, but in this hyperpartisan time on Capitol Hill, every vote counts. These days, for just about anything to make it through the Senate, 60 votes are needed to overcome a filibuster. If Senator Lautenberg is replaced by a Republican, then the Democrats will need to find six Republicans to get to 60 instead of five, and that’s after getting every Democrat on board (not always easy).

But wait, this is Governor Christie we’re talking about – he of the “bromance” with President Obama that started during superstorm Sandy last fall and resumed last week with the president’s trip to the Jersey shore. New Jersey is a Democratic-leaning state, and Lautenberg was a true-blue Democrat. Might Christie decide to go with his state’s proclivities and put a Democrat in there, maybe his friend Newark Mayor Cory Booker?

Lautenberg was already retiring at the end of next year, and Mayor Booker was widely assumed to be running, and expected to win.

But there’s an excellent reason for Christie not to go in that direction: He’s already popular with Democrats in the state, and is expected to win a second term as governor by a wide margin. The latest polls show him up by more than 30 points. So he doesn't need to do more to woo Democrats. 

It’s the Republican presidential primaries in 2016 that could make a Democratic appointment unwise. If Christie decides to run, he will have some making up to do with conservative voters, especially in the early primary and caucus states (see bromance, Obama). Precisely because he has a good relationship with the president, he probably can’t do him any favors by naming a Democrat to Lautenberg’s seat. And so we’re guessing that he chooses a Republican. 

The Washington Post’s The Fix blog names a few Republican possibilities: state Sen. Tom Kean Jr., the GOP’s 2006 Senate nominee; Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno; and Joe Kyrillos, a Christie ally who was the Republican Senate nominee in 2012.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.