Obama vs. Romney 101: 7 ways they differ on energy issues

Both President Obama and Mitt Romney claim to want to expand America’s access to conventional fuels and green energy. But their energy plans have very different flavors.

2. Oil and gas development

Evan Vucci/AP
Demonstrators march outside the White House on Nov. 6, 2011, in Washington to demand a stop to the Keystone XL tar sands oil pipeline.

Obama in March 2010 unveiled plans to boost US oil production by expanding available sites for offshore drilling along the Atlantic coast, Gulf of Mexico, and Alaska. Just weeks later, in April 2010, the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico killed 11 men and polluted wide areas of the Gulf, prompting him to backtrack on opening so many coastal areas to offshore drilling – and to require a go-slow approach on deep-water drilling permits pending upgrades in emergency capabilities, equipment, safety regulations, and inspections.

But during his State of the Union message earlier this year, he announced he would now go ahead and open more than 75 percent of potential offshore oil and gas reserves to development.

With regard to the Keystone XL oil pipeline planned from Canada to Texas, the Obama administration halted the controversial plan on Jan. 18, 2012. The White House blamed a congressional deadline that it said made it impossible to adequately assess environmental and other concerns. In March, Obama approved the southern half of the pipeline.

Romney proposes cutting federal permitting hurdles and giving states major authority over energy development – essentially allowing the states’ weaker regulatory and permitting processes to hold sway on millions of acres of federal lands, excluding only National Parks and a few other now-restricted areas.

Doing so would vastly boost US oil and gas exploration both onshore and off, the plan contends. Romney's plan would permit drilling wherever it can be done safely, it says. This includes the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic and Pacific Outer Continental Shelves, Western lands, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, and the Alaska coast. Offshore leasing would "aggressively" open new zones off the coasts of Virginia and the Carolinas to start – and then expand.

For the Keystone XL pipeline, Romney has said he will approve it "on Day 1" of his presidency. “I also will partner closely with our neighbors. Canada and Mexico have extraordinary resources of their own that can provide secure, reliable supplies for our economy. This starts with my approval of the Keystone XL pipeline on Day 1.”

2 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.