Obama vs. Romney 101: 6 ways they differ on health-care reform

Former Gov. Mitt Romney has taken a libertarian turn since championing health-care reforms in Massachusetts, including an individual mandate to purchase insurance, which became the model for President Obama's signature law. Here’s a list of areas where the candidates differ.

5. Medicaid

Charles Dharapak/AP/File
Mitt Romney stands with Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, who has expressed reservations about his state's role in the expansion of Medicaid through President Obama's health-care law, in this June 27 file photo.

A centerpiece of the ACA is expansion of Medicaid – the health-insurance system for low-income and disabled Americans – which would have insured some 17 million additional people if implemented as originally envisioned. But in upholding the ACA, the Supreme Court allowed states to opt out of the Medicaid expansion without penalty; so far at least six Republican-led states, including Texas and Florida, have chosen not to expand their states' programs.

Romney proposes turning the federal portion of Medicaid funding into block grants, or lump-sum payments. Annual growth would be capped at the rate of inflation plus 1 percent. Democrats say that given high inflation in health care, the Romney plan would underfund the program, forcing states to cut people from the Medicaid rolls and/or reduce services.  

5 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.