The Paul Ryan budget: 5 go-to sources for understanding it

Looking for in-depth analysis of the Paul Ryan budget plan? D.C. Decoder has compiled a list of excellent sources to help you sort out truth from fiction.

5. Independent Voter Network

An informative feature of the editor's blog for the Independent Voter Network is an interactive graph that compares the Ryan budget plan with Obama’s budget proposal. (The graph was created by Mike Shedlock, an investment adviser who writes a global economics blog.)

The graph charts spending predictions under both plans from 2011 to 2021. It highlights 10 areas or programs that both budgets would affect, from Medicare and Social Security to national security spending and revenue.

Beyond just listing how much money the Ryan and Obama budgets allocate for each program, the graph shows the spending difference between the two plans, which is sometimes drastic. It shows that under Obama’s plan, by 2014 the government would be spending 29.9 percent more on Medicaid than it would under Ryan’s budget plan. It also shows where the spending differences would be negligible: Ryan and Obama allocate almost exactly the same amount for Social Security, for instance.

Most important, this graph breaks it down to the basics, the cold hard numbers. It's easy for readers to compare funding for programs that matter to them. 

The Independent Voter Network is a political news website committed to representing the independent voter’s viewpoint. Founded in 2008 as an initiative to cover California issues in a nonpartisan way, it has expanded to cover national issues. IVN uses independent writers and contributors, and discourages partisan reporting.

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.