Are roads racist? Buttigieg says yes, talks transportation reform.

All eyes are on Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg and how he will develop the transportation sector after the passing of President Biden’s infrastructure bill. Mr. Buttigieg says his plan includes building racial equity through highway design and road projects.

Alberto Pezzali/AP
Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg speaks at the COP26 U.N. Climate Summit, in Glasgow, Scotland, Nov. 10, 2021. As a result of Mr. Biden's infrastructure bill, Mr. Buttigieg will handle the largest infusion of cash into transportation since the 1950s.

Pete Buttigieg, the transportation secretary who holds the purse strings to much of President Joe Biden’s $1 trillion infrastructure package, was holding forth with reporters on its impact – the promise of more electric cars, intercity train routes, bigger airports – when a pointed question came.

How would he go about building racial equity into infrastructure?

The former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, and 2020 Democratic presidential candidate laid out his argument that highway design can reflect racism, noting that at least $1 billion in the bill will help reconnect cities and neighborhoods that had been racially segregated or divided by road projects.

“I’m still surprised that some people were surprised when I pointed to the fact that if a highway was built for the purpose of dividing a white and a Black neighborhood ... that obviously reflects racism,” he said.

Racial equity is an issue where Democratic priorities and Mr. Buttigieg’s future align. One of his greatest shortcomings as a White House candidate was his inability to win over Black voters. How he navigates that heading into the 2022 midterms will probably shape the fortunes of Mr. Biden’s agenda and the Democratic Party, if not his own prospects.

Republicans seeking to exploit the issue pounced on Mr. Buttigieg’s words.

“I heard some stuff, some weird stuff from the secretary of transportation trying to make this about social issues,” said Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. “To me, a road’s a road.”

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz tweeted sarcastically: “The roads are racist. We must get rid of roads.”

But Mr. Buttigieg didn’t engage and was off to his next stop, the climate summit in Scotland. There he stood for almost a dozen interviews as he promoted provisions of Mr. Biden’s bill that would build a network of electric vehicle charging stations. He also engaged with young climate activists and took photos with former President Barack Obama.

On racism in roadways, he said simply: “I don’t know who it hurts to acknowledge that harm was done and to propose doing something to fix it.”

His department later announced it would grant extra discretionary aid to help as many as 20 U.S. communities remove portions of interstates, redesign rural main streets, and repurpose former rail lines. That could help places from Syracuse, New York, where many residents back a plan to tear down portions and build a walkable grid, to racially divided areas in New Orleans and St. Paul, Minnesota.

As Mr. Biden prepares to sign the infrastructure bill on Monday, eyes are turning to the man still best known as “Mayor Pete,” a newcomer whose promise of “generational change” and real-world sensibility of fixing potholes launched him to the top of the early Democratic primary contests during the 2020 campaign.

Quickly endorsing Mr. Biden after abandoning the race, Mr. Buttigieg now stands to become one of the more powerful brokers in Washington, handling the largest infusion of cash into the transportation sector since the 1950s creation of the interstate highway system.

“Armed with that much money and significant latitude in how to spend it, Buttigieg is poised to be the most influential secretary of transportation ever,” said Jeff Davis, a senior fellow at the Eno Center for Transportation. The department was founded in 1967.

In all, about $120 billion of the $550 billion in new transportation spending in the bill would come in the form of competitive grants that give Mr. Buttigieg discretion in how the money is used.

A separate social spending bill pending in the House would pour billions more dollars into the transportation department, which already expects to see its annual budget surge by over 50% to $140 billion.

“It’s a whole lot of money,” says Ray LaHood, a former Republican congressman from Illinois and transportation secretary under Mr. Obama, who in comparison presided over the release of $48 billion in transportation money in the 2009 Recovery Act. Since then, Mr. LaHood said, major federal investments in transportation have been stagnant, creating pent-up demand for road, bridge, and Amtrak projects that can quickly launch.

It’s both a boon and challenge to Mr. Buttigieg, who revealed in August that he was going to become a dad with husband Chasten. He took several weeks of paternity leave to care for the twins, returning in October as Republicans criticized him for leaving his post. More recently, he juggled time keeping watch over his infant son, who was ill for three weeks and hospitalized for a respiratory illness, while he worked to address national supply chain problems.

“When somebody welcomes a new child into their family, and goes on leave to take care of that child that’s not a vacation, it’s work,” he said last month. “I’m not going to apologize.”

Starting this week, Mr. Buttigieg will join other Cabinet members to pitch the plan around the country.

“Look, a lot of this sells itself because communities never needed to be persuaded that their bridge needed to be fixed or that their airport needed an upgrade or that their ports needed investment,” Mr. Buttigieg said. “They’ve been trying to get Washington to catch up to them.”

Anthony Foxx, who was Mr. Obama’s transportation secretary from 2013 to 2017, said a big challenge will be the massive operational details in the department, where Mr. Buttigieg is supported by veteran hands. Many programs are new, requiring clear guidelines to states and localities on what they are eligible for and how the money is to be awarded. “They will be managing multiple plans with very high dollar figures, creating pressure on administrative staff,” Mr. Foxx said.

On Sunday, Mr. Biden named former New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu, who oversaw the city’s rebuilding effort after it was devastated by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, to be a watchdog on the disbursement of the money.

Once many programs are in place, after six to nine months, Mr. Foxx said, “that’s when the magic happens on what to fund and what may not cut the mustard.” The winners would come in the form of hundreds of grant announcements for medium-sized road projects that could accelerate into spring 2023 with the first awards for multibillion-dollar bridges, intercity rail, and New York’s Gateway tunnel.

As a mayor, Mr. Buttigieg was attuned to calls to fix roads and potholes. He relished talking about state-of-the-art sewer system. Now that message will be national with the stakes far greater.

“The currency of politics is exposure, and he’s getting a lot of exposure,” said Larry Grisalano, who was Mr. Buttigieg’s advertising consultant.

At the White House, staff warmly refer to him as “Secretary Mayor Pete,” and Mr. Biden has compared Mr. Buttigieg to his late son Beau. The White House celebrated Chasten’s birthday with cupcakes. “You’re the best, man,” Mr. Biden said after Mr. Buttigieg spoke at the White House over the summer.

Yet in a city laden with ambition, Mr. Buttigieg’s potential to move farther onto the national stage can make him a target.

Nina Smith, Mr. Buttigieg’s former traveling campaign press secretary, said as Mr. Biden’s top lieutenant on the bill, Mr. Buttigieg has the opportunity to lead an effort to “eradicate past injustices.” Mr. Buttigieg during the 2020 campaign was never able to win over large shares of Black voters.

“That’s an added responsibility that I think he’s very much aware of and making a central part of the work,” said Ms. Smith, a Democratic political consultant.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Tom Beaumont reported from Des Moines, Iowa.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.