After 200 years of white men, Boston's next mayor will be a woman

Michelle Wu has emerged as the top candidate following Tuesday’s preliminary election for Boston’s mayor. A three-way finish for the No. 2 slot is still too close to call, but come November, both candidates will be women of color – a historic first for the city.  

Stew Milne/AP
Boston mayoral candidate Michelle Wu talks with reporters after casting her ballot in the mayoral race on Election Day in Boston, Sept. 14, 2021. Ms. Wu was elected to the Boston City Council in 2013 as the first Asian-American woman to serve.

For the first time in 200 years, Boston voters have narrowed the field of mayoral candidates to two women of color who will face off against each other in November.

The question is, which two?

Democrat Michelle Wu emerged the top vote-getter in Tuesday’s preliminary election, but the race to decide her opponent in November remained too early to call early Wednesday.

Ms. Wu, a city councilor, easily won Tuesday’s preliminary balloting. But three other candidates – acting mayor Kim Janey and fellow councilors Annissa Essaibi George and Andrea Campbell – were in a tight race for the No. 2 slot. Ms. Essaibi George declared victory late Tuesday night, and both Ms. Janey and Ms. Campbell conceded defeat. The Associated Press has not yet called the second finisher because of the close margin of votes separating the three women.

All four are candidates of color, as is John Barros, Boston’s former economic development chief and the only man in contention. Mr. Barros trailed well behind the four women.

No matter who joins Ms. Wu on the Nov. 2 ballot, history has already been made in a city that has never elected a woman, Black resident, or Asian American as mayor. For the past two centuries, the office has been held by white men.

Ms. Wu and Tuesday’s other winner will face off against each other on Nov. 2, ushering in a new era for the city which has wrestled with racial and ethnic strife.

“I’m overjoyed that we are confident we’ve made the top two and are moving on to the final election,” Ms. Wu told her supporters earlier in the evening. “I just want to take a moment to honor and thank this historic field of candidates, an amazing moment for the City of Boston.”

Ms. Essaibi George said she’d won enough support to challenge Ms. Wu in November.

“I am so grateful to you showing up not just tonight but showing up for the last eight months,” she told supporters, adding that while every vote needed to be counted, “it doesn’t mean we can’t celebrate.”

Earlier this year, Ms. Janey became the first Black Bostonian and first woman to occupy the city’s top office in an acting capacity after former Mayor Marty Walsh stepped down to become President Joe Biden’s labor secretary.

“I want to congratulate Michelle Wu and Annissa Essaibi George on their victories this evening,” Ms. Janey said in a statement. “This was a spirited and historic race, and I wish them both luck in the final election.”

There had been an effort among some leaders in the Black community to rally around a single candidate to ensure that at least one Black mayoral hopeful could claim one of the two top slots.

All of the candidates are Democrats. Mayoral races in Boston do not include party primaries.

The candidates hail from a range of backgrounds. Ms. Wu’s parents immigrated to the United States from Taiwan. Ms. Janey and Ms. Campbell are Black. Ms. Essaibi George describes herself as a first-generation Arab-Polish American. Mr. Barros is of Cape Verdean descent.

Ms. Wu was elected to the Boston City Council in 2013 at age 28, becoming the first Asian-American woman to serve on the council. In 2016, she was elected city council president by her colleagues in a unanimous vote, becoming the first woman of color to serve as president.

Ms. Essaibi George won a series of key endorsements during the race including from unions representing firefighters, nurses, and emergency medical technicians. She also won the backing of former Boston Police Commissioner William Gross.

Ms. Essaibi George grew up in the city’s Dorchester neighborhood and taught in the Boston Public Schools. She was elected to the city council in 2015. Her father immigrated to the U.S. from Tunisia in 1972. Her mother was born in a displaced persons’ camp in Germany of Polish parents.

The November contest could also be a test of whether voters in a city long dominated by parochial neighborhood and ethnic politics are ready to tap someone like Ms. Wu, who grew up in Chicago.

Ms. Wu moved to Boston to attend Harvard University and Harvard Law School and studied under U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, then a law professor. She’s the only candidate not born in Boston.

Boston has changed radically since the 1970s, when the city found itself in the national spotlight over the turmoil brought on by school desegregation, and in the late 1980s, when the case of Charles Stuart again inflamed simmering racial tensions.

Mr. Stuart is believed to have shot and killed his pregnant wife in 1989 while trying to blame the killing on an unknown Black man, prompting police to search Black neighborhoods in vain for a suspect. Mr. Stuart later jumped to his death from a bridge.

The latest U.S. Census statistics show residents who identify as white make up 44.6% of the population compared to Black residents (19.1%), Latino residents (18.7%), and residents of Asian descent (11.2%).

Among the challenges facing the city are those brought on by gentrification, which has forced out many long-term residents, including those in historically Black neighborhoods.

Added to that are a host of other challenges that will face the new mayor, from transportation woes, racial injustice, and policing to schools and the ongoing response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.