After two-year investigation, CFO of Trump company surrenders

Allen Weisselberg has turned himself in to authorities ahead of expected charges. Former President Donald Trump denied that the business practices of his organization were criminal, arguing that practices were legal and typical of American businesses. 

Evan Vucci/AP
Donald Trump (left), his CFO, Allen Weisselberg (center), and Donald Trump Jr. during a news conference in New York on Jan. 11, 2017. The Trump Organization is expected to be charged with crimes pertaining to benefits given to top employees.

Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg surrendered to authorities early Thursday ahead of expected charges against him and former President Donald Trump’s company, according to multiple news outlets.

Mr. Weisselberg was seen walking into the courthouse in lower Manhattan around 6:20 a.m. with his lawyer.

New York prosecutors are expected to announce the first criminal indictment Thursday in a two-year investigation into Mr. Trump’s business practices, accusing his namesake company and Mr. Weisselberg of tax crimes related to fringe benefits for employees.

The charges against the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer, Mr. Weisselberg, remained sealed Wednesday night but were to be unveiled ahead of an afternoon arraignment at a state court in Manhattan, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The people were not authorized to speak about an ongoing investigation and did so on condition of anonymity.

There was no indication Mr. Trump himself would be charged at this stage of the investigation, jointly pursued by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. and New York Attorney General Letitia James, both Democrats.

Mr. Trump did not respond to reporters’ shouted questions about the New York case as he visited Texas on Wednesday, but earlier in the week, the Republican had blasted the New York prosecutors as “rude, nasty, and totally biased” and said his company’s actions were “standard practice throughout the United States business community, and in no way a crime.”

The planned charges were said to be linked to benefits the company gave to top executives, like the use of apartments, cars, and school tuition, the people familiar with the matter told the AP.

Messages seeking comment were left with a spokesperson and lawyers for the Trump Organization. Mr. Weisselberg’s lawyer, Mary Mulligan, declined to comment. The Manhattan district attorney’s office declined to comment.

Mr. Vance, who leaves office at the end of the year, has been conducting a wide-ranging investigation into a variety of matters involving Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization.

His office has looked into hush-money payments paid to women on Mr. Trump’s behalf and truthfulness in the company’s property valuations and tax assessments, among other matters.

Mr. Vance fought a long battle to get Mr. Trump’s tax records and has been subpoenaing documents and interviewing company executives and other Trump insiders.

Ms. James assigned two lawyers from her office to work with Mr. Vance’s team after her office found evidence of possible criminal wrongdoing while conducting a separate civil investigation of Mr. Trump.

Mr. Weisselberg had come under scrutiny, in part, because of questions about his son’s use of a Trump apartment at little or no cost.

Barry Weisselberg, who managed a Trump-operated ice rink in Central Park, testified in a 2018 divorce deposition that Trump Parc East apartment was a “corporate apartment, so we didn’t have rent.”

Barry’s ex-wife, Jen Weisselberg, has been cooperating with both inquiries and given investigators reams of tax records and other documents.

The case against Allen Weisselberg – a loyal lieutenant to Mr. Trump and his real estate-developer father, Fred – could give prosecutors the means to pressure the executive into cooperating and telling them what he knows about Mr. Trump’s business dealings.

The Trump Organization is the business entity through which the former president manages his many entrepreneurial affairs, including his investments in office towers, hotels, and golf courses, his many marketing deals, and his television pursuits. Mr. Trump’s sons, Donald Jr., and Eric, have been in charge of the company’s day-to-day operations since he became president.

Although Mr. Trump isn’t expected to be charged Thursday, allegations against the company bearing his name raise questions about his knowledge of – or involvement in – business that practices prosecutors suspect were illegal.

James Repetti, a tax lawyer and professor at Boston College Law School, said a company like the Trump Organization would generally have a responsibility to withhold taxes not just on salary, but other forms of compensation – like the use of an apartment or automobile.

Such perks wouldn’t be considered taxable income if they were required as a condition of employment, Mr. Repetti said, such as providing an apartment for the convenience of an employee who is required to be at the office or worksite at odd or frequent hours, or allowing the use of a car for business purposes.

Another prominent New York City real estate figure, the late Leona Helmsley, was convicted of tax fraud in a federal case that arose from her company paying to remodel her home without her reporting that as income.

The Trump Organization case involves possible violations of New York state tax laws.

“The IRS routinely looks for abuse of fringe benefits when auditing closely-held businesses,” Mr. Repetti said. “The temptation for the business is that it claims a tax deduction for the expense, while the recipient does not report it in income.”

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.