Conservatives stake their claim to climate activism in Miami

Climate action has long been seen as a liberal cause. But for a group of right-leaning environmentalists, who recently held a climate rally in Miami, combating climate change is a conservative cause, too.

Timothy Gardner/Reuters
Participants hold signs at an American Conservation Coalition rally in Miami on June 5, 2021. Part of a larger initiative spearheaded by right-leaning environmentalists, the rally was billed as the country’s first conservative climate rally.

For Benji Backer, being conservative means believing in limited government, market-based solutions – and the scientists who say carbon emissions must be cut to avoid the worst of climate change.

Mr. Backer’s nonprofit, the American Conservation Coalition (ACC), held what it billed as the country’s first conservative climate rally in Miami, part of an effort by the 23-year-old activist to convince fellow right-leaning Americans they don’t have to be liberals to support action on the issue.

It included a handful of Republican politicians from south Florida, which faces climate threats including tidal floods from rising seas, stronger hurricanes, and health risks from higher temperatures and humidity.

“The environment does not have a preferred political party,” Mr. Backer said from a podium overlooking a bay near where the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has proposed a $6 billion sea wall. “Today conservatives are reclaiming our seat at the environmental table.”

An avid skier and hiker, Mr. Backer began organizing the ACC while a college freshman and becoming dismayed with then-President Donald Trump, who said climate change was a hoax created by the Chinese. The group said it hopes its membership, currently in the thousands, will expand to 10,000 by the end of this year.

Mr. Backer’s mission reflects a nuance in U.S. climate politics that is often lost in the partisan debate: while the Republican Party is seen as opposed to climate action, many of its members believe in global warming but disagree with liberals over how to fix it.

That poses no small problem, however.

Environmentalists accuse Mr. Backer’s group of obstructing the aggressive climate action they say is needed to save the planet by proposing half-measure market-based solutions instead.

While the ACC supports parts of Democratic President Joe Biden’s climate plan, such as those that focus on innovation, from nuclear energy advances to carbon capture and storage, it also faults his proposals for being bloated and for failing “to streamline burdensome regulations.”

Mr. Biden’s administration hopes to decarbonize the U.S. economy by 2050 and the power sector by 2035, mainly by ramping up clean energy use and electrifying vehicles and buildings.

The ACC platform only calls for moving “toward” global net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, not hitting the target or surpassing it. Rather than the mandates included in Mr. Biden’s plan, it favors “market solutions” to cutting greenhouse gases, such as constructing more buildings out of wood that stores carbon, creating new global forests in a “trillion trees” program, and increasing use of emissions-free hydropower.

“I don’t like mandates because sometimes they have a lot of unintended consequences of propping up some people at the expense of others,” said Emily Nielsen, a 29-year-old software engineer attending the rally, which attracted about 200 people.

“Conservatives are more concerned about encouraging innovation or voluntary actions to address climate change,” she said.

Taking action now

But critics say the measures supported by conservative groups like the ACC could delay progress on the urgent steps needed to curb climate change.

“We have the technology to fight climate change today. We need to start taking action now,” said Julie McNamara, an analyst in the climate and energy program at the nonprofit Union of Concerned Scientists.

Carla Staver, an ecologist and the associate director of the Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies, added that planting new forests can be one component of a comprehensive approach on climate change, but that estimates of their climate impact put forward by some conservatives can be “wildly optimistic.”

Another big sticking point for climate activists: the ACC does not support imposing a carbon fee, a market mechanism that would encourage investors to move to cleaner energy sources.

“An obsessive focus on innovation and policies which impose no costs on anyone are by definition policies that are not up to the task,” said Jerry Taylor, the president of the Niskanen Center, a moderate think tank.

Mr. Backer hopes soon there will be hundreds of climate-minded Republicans in Congress, up from dozens now, pointing to recent polls that show that younger members of the party are more open to curbing climate change than older ones.

U.S. Representative Carlos Giménez of Florida, elected in 2020, and Miami Mayor Francis Suarez were among the Republicans who attended the rally.

For now staunch Republican support for the drilling and mining industries still looms over conservative efforts on climate. A few older attendees at the rally held signs saying: “There is no climate crisis!”

Mr. Taylor said small steps may be as far as the party can go at the moment given that many Republican lawmakers represent states with major fossil fuel industries.

“It could be that this kind of small ball incrementalism is all that really is possible,” he said.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.