House vote on Marjorie Taylor Greene: A test of GOP unity

House Democrats are forcing a vote to strip Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of her committee assignments, citing her endorsements of political violence and conspiracy theories. House Republicans are split on whether to publicly defend her.

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., is accompanied by fellow House Republicans following a meeting called by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy on Capitol Hill, Feb. 3, 2021. President Donald Trump has called Ms. Greene a “future Republican star."

House Republicans will be forced to go on the record defending or rebuking Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has drawn bipartisan condemnation over her embrace of far-right conspiracy theories and racist comments, as well as her past endorsement of violence against Democrats.

Democrats are expected to move forward Thursday with a vote that is all-but-certain to strip the Georgia Republican of her committee assignments. For Republicans, it represents a politically agonizing dilemma that underscores tension that has riven the party over its path forward since Donald Trump lost the White House.

Do they support a newly elected colleague, whom Mr. Trump has praised as a “future Republican star”? Or do they side with Democrats and take action against Ms. Greene, who has suggested that school shootings were staged, voiced support for the baseless QAnon conspiracy theory, and once said Black people “are held slaves to the Democratic Party.”

Democrats issued an ultimatum earlier in the week, telling House Republicans to strip Ms. Greene of her committee assignments – or they would. Bipartisan pressure built after Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called Ms. Greene’s “loony lies” a “cancer” for the party.

But House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Wednesday ruled out taking action. Instead, he accused Democrats of a “partisan power grab” for targeting Ms. Greene, who once suggested that a Jewish-owned financial firm may have been involved in a plot to spark California wildfires using a space laser.

“If this is not the bottom, I don’t know what the hell is,” House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said before a resolution was sent to the House floor to strip Ms. Greene of her posts.

Mr. McCarthy’s decision to back Greene comes at a time when the party has been ideologically adrift after Mr. Trump’s loss, struggling over whether to embrace his norm-busting divisiveness or the GOP’s more traditional, policy-oriented conservative values.

On Wednesday, House Republicans blocked an effort by conservative hardliners to oust the No. 3 House Republican, Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., from her leadership role. Ms. Cheney, a daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, had enraged Trump supporters by voting to impeach him over the riot at the United States Capitol.

In sticking by both women, Mr. McCarthy was attempting to placate both traditional conservatives and populists, like Ms. Greene, who emulate Trump. The moves were typical of Mr. McCarthy’s preference to avoid ruffling feathers as he charts his path to someday becoming House speaker.

“You know what that’s going to mean?” he told reporters Wednesday evening. “Two years from now, we’re going to win the majority. That’s because this conference is more united. We’ve got the right leadership team behind it.”

Mr. McConnell praised his House counterparts on Thursday, telling reporters, “I congratulate Liz Cheney on a landslide victory. It must be very satisfying to her, and it was a great win.”

But the GOP’s two wings remain concerned that the other is leading them down the wrong path, and to some, Wednesday’s outcome seemed more an uneasy truce than a full-on peace treaty.

“This is about the direction of our party and whether or not we’re going to be a majority who’s dedicated to just one person or we’re going to be a united Republican majority,” said Rep. Jaime Herrera-Beutler, R-Wash., who with Ms. Cheney was among just 10 House Republicans to back impeaching Mr. Trump.

Ms. Greene has shown support for calls to violence against Democrats, bizarre fictions about faked school shootings, and unfounded QAnon theories about Democrats joining in child abuse rings.

The conspiracy theories she’s embraced came up during a closed-door Republican caucus meeting on Wednesday, which attendants described as spirited with long lines of speakers at the microphones. Some said Ms. Greene apologized to her colleagues, though there were conflicting, vague versions of exactly what she’d said.

“She was contrite. And I think she brought a lot of people over to her side,” said conservative Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky.

That’s at odds with statements she’s made in recent weeks on Twitter, where she has vowed to never back down or apologize and labeled her critics traitors, while using the Democratic push to punish her to raise money for her campaign.

Democrats say it’s politically advantageous to tie some Republicans to the far-right Ms. Greene. This week, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee launched a $500,000 ad campaign that attempts to link eight Republicans to her and other adherents of QAnon, which focuses on the false belief that top Democrats are involved in child sex trafficking and cannibalism.

Mr. McCarthy condemned Ms. Greene’s past endorsements of conspiracy theories – after weeks of saying little critical of her – and said the first-term congresswoman had recognized in a private conversation that she must meet “a higher standard” as a lawmaker.

“I hold her to her word, as well as her actions going forward,” Mr. McCarthy said.

She burst onto the national political scene with enthusiastic support from Mr. Trump.

Republicans appointed Ms. Greene to the Education and Labor Committee, a decision that drew especially harsh criticism because of her suggestions that mass school shootings in Connecticut and Florida could be hoaxes. Ms. Greene is also on the Budget Committee.

Mr. McCarthy said Democrats turned down his offer to move Ms. Greene onto the House Small Business Committee instead.

It’s unusual for party leaders to strip lawmakers of committee assignments, which can help them address their districts’ needs and raise campaign contributions.

In 2019, House GOP leaders removed Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who had a history of racist comments, from the Agriculture and Judiciary panels after he wondered aloud in a New York Times story about when the term “white supremacist” became offensive. He lost the Republican primary for his seat in 2020 and is out of Congress after serving nine terms.

In online videos and through supportive “likes” on social media, Ms. Greene has voiced support for racist beliefs, calls for violence against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and former President Barack Obama, and various false theories.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to House vote on Marjorie Taylor Greene: A test of GOP unity
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2021/0204/House-vote-on-Marjorie-Taylor-Greene-A-test-of-GOP-unity
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe