How Georgia GOP blends fraud claims with needed voter turnout

President Donald Trump and his supporters claim the presidential election was riddled with fraud, but are still asking Republican voters to show up for Georgia’s key Senate runoff vote. Despite mixed messages, voters seem keen to cast their ballots.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
President Donald Trump and Republican U.S. Sen. Kelly Loeffler listen as U.S. Sen. David Perdue speaks at a campaign rally in Valdosta, Georgia, Dec. 5, 2020. "Everybody is going to vote," says Kayla Frank, a Trump supporter, of the state's Jan. 5 Senate runoffs.

Convinced that the presidential election had been stolen from Donald Trump, the young couple from Blairsville, Georgia at first resolved to skip the state’s Jan. 5 runoffs for two United States Senate seats. What’s the point, they figured, of voting in another rigged election?

Then they thought better of it, setting aside their anger for the more pressing concern of keeping one of the two houses of Congress under Republican control.

“Everybody is going to vote,” said Kayla Frank.

Ms. Frank and her partner, C.J. Townsend, had joined thousands of Trump supporters at a rally in Valdosta, Georgia on Saturday night. Mr. Trump had come to tell Georgia Republicans to vote in the Senate races that would decide which party controls Congress. But he spent most of the rally repeating his false and widely debunked election-fraud claims – and bashing leading Georgia Republicans for not helping him overturn his loss.

It’s a mixed message that many Republicans fear could tilt the tight Georgia Senate races in favor of Democrats if any significant number of Trump supporters boycott the election – as some of the president’s supporters have advocated in right-wing social media circles. Among those calling for sitting out the races in protest are two prominent pro-Trump lawyers – Sidney Powell and Lin Wood – who have promoted outlandish election-fraud conspiracy theories.

But voters like Ms. Frank and Mr. Townsend have tuned them out, according to Reuters interviews with 50 Republican voters over the past week in rural, urban, and suburban areas of Georgia. All 50 said they planned to vote in Senate runoffs they deemed crucial – even though almost all believed the presidential election was tainted by fraud. (One, however, said he would support Democrats.)

The interviews suggest that Republican Senate candidates could see strong voter turnout despite the turmoil that has engulfed the Georgia Republican party, pitting Trump loyalists against top Republican state officials the president has attacked for rebuffing his fraud allegations.

Georgia has not elected a Democratic U.S. senator in two decades, but Mr. Biden’s slim victory there has given Democrats hope that Senate candidates Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff can beat Republican incumbents Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue in the runoffs, which were triggered after no candidate won a majority of votes on Nov. 3. Polls show both races are tight.

Mr. Townsend, at the Trump rally, said he believes that there is overwhelming evidence that Mr. Trump was cheated. Ms. Frank said her sense of being robbed was all the more painful because it had been the first time she voted in a presidential election.

Both said they had considered but ultimately dismissed sitting out the Senate contest. While they still hold out hope for Mr. Trump’s last-ditch efforts to overturn the election, they said they want to ensure a Republican Senate can provide a check on Democrat Joe Biden if Mr. Trump’s efforts fail.

“I was kind of on the fence,” Mr. Townsend said. “But I don’t see how that is going to help anything. If we all sit at home, they are still going to allow the vote to continue.”

Hopes for high turnout

The attitude of voters like Mr. Townsend and Ms. Frank should come as some relief to Republican officials who have scrambled to muffle calls for boycotts. They have struggled to meld two incongruous messages – that U.S. elections are rife with fraud favoring Democrats, but Republicans’ votes in the critical Senate races will count.

Jason Shepherd, chairman of the Republican Party in Cobb County, said he has been receiving a few emails a day from members claiming they won’t vote because they believe the process is corrupt. Chuck Clay, an Atlanta lawyer and the former statewide head of the party, said he worries about a “malaise” setting in about Republican voters that could dampen turnout.

But several voters said in interviews they believed Mr. Trump’s fraud allegations would motivate voters rather than discourage them. The prospect of fraud has made voters believe that Ms. Loeffler and Mr. Perdue might need an overwhelming advantage to win.

The Rev. Ike Jefferson, of Fellowship Baptist Church, about 20 miles north of where Mr. Trump’s rally was held, said he believed the prospect of Democratic control of Congress will be enough to drive Republican turnout.

“I believe Georgia is going to get out and vote. I pray they do,” he said after leading Sunday services.

A handful of the 50 voters interviewed by Reuters dismissed Mr. Trump’s fraud claims entirely, acknowledging Mr. Biden won fairly. William Connelly, a Trump supporter, considers the stolen-election uproar irrelevant to the Senate runoffs.

“He’s just a crybaby, and he’s lost, and that’s all there is to it,” Mr. Connelly, a former professional boxer and factory worker, said of Mr. Trump as he stood outside a grocery store in Nahunta, a rural town in southeastern Georgia. “I think there will be a good turnout.”

Political minefield

The runoffs, however they turn out, have put Georgia at the center of increasingly bitter warfare between Trump loyalists and establishment Republicans that could have profound implications for the party’s future. Mr. Trump has repeatedly trashed Georgia Republicans, including Gov. Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, for saying the election result was accurate and refusing to help Mr. Trump overturn it.

Under intense pressure, Mr. Raffensperger and Governor Kemp have defended the fairness of the election, a stance underpinned by two recounts. But they’ve walked a fine line between defending the state’s election system while also declaring their continued support for Mr. Trump even as the president publicly rebukes and ridicules them.

Georgia Republicans’ reluctance to repudiate Mr. Trump underscores his continuing influence in motivating massive numbers of voters and pulling the party toward his brash brand of populism. In a striking example, Republican Georgia Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan heaped praise on the president in a tweet responding to Mr. Trump’s tweet calling for Mr. Duncan’s ouster from office because he’s “too dumb or corrupt to recognize massive evidence of fraud in GA.”

Mr. Duncan tweeted back: “Thank you for 4 years of conservative leadership … you have proven that a business minded outsider can be effective in DC.”

Republicans who reject Mr. Trump’s fraud claims will suffer consequences when they seek re-election, said Ronald Ham, the party’s head in Brantley County. He plans to vote against Governor Kemp when he faces election in 2022 – even though he considers the governor a friend. Mr. Ham likened what he called an assault on the U.S. election system by Democrats to the September 11, 2001 attacks.

“This is our 9/11,” he said. “We will use our voice, and we will vote.”

The governor, the lieutenant governor, and the secretary of state might as well “pack their bags,” he said.

With Mr. Trump’s court losses mounting, Mr. Ham said he was now most optimistic about a petition filed this week by the state of Texas with the U.S. Supreme Court. The case argues that changes made by Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to expand mail-in voting amid the coronavirus pandemic were unlawful and should nullify those states’ election results. Mr. Trump and Republican attorneys general in 17 U.S. states on Wednesday threw their support behind the lawsuit, which the office of Georgia’s attorney general – a Republican – called “constitutionally, legally, and factually wrong.”

Senate candidates Ms. Loeffler and Mr. Perdue endorsed the Texas legal action. But they, too, are treading carefully in navigating the bitterness that has engulfed the state party. While neither has explicitly said the election was stolen from Mr. Trump, they have generally supported his efforts to overturn it and have called for Mr. Raffensperger’s resignation.

For Chasity Pawvlik, that’s not enough. The Trump supporter said she would vote for Mr. Perdue but maybe not Ms. Loeffler, who was appointed by Governor Kemp and therefore needed to take bolder action to earn Ms. Pawvlik’s support. Among other things, Ms. Pawvlik wants Ms. Loeffler to push Governor Kemp to conduct a third-party investigation of voting machines that have become the focus of debunked conspiracy theories about altered votes.

“If she wants my vote, she needs to call him out,” said Ms. Pawvlik. “We need to see those machines.”

One Republican voter interviewed by Reuters, however, said he had decided to support Democrats for Senate, in part because Ms. Loeffler and Mr. Perdue had aligned themselves so closely with Mr. Trump.

Corey Rudolph, a resident of Alpharetta, an Atlanta suburb, lamented that conventional Republican principles have been lost under Mr. Trump. He hoped a more centrist party would emerge but had his doubts.

“If he keeps control of the media the way that he has, especially the right-wing media, I don’t see how Republicanism as I have known it in the past can come back,” Mr. Rudolph said.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How Georgia GOP blends fraud claims with needed voter turnout
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today