In South Carolina, Graham defeats Harrison, securing fourth term

Republican Lindsey Graham has successfully fended off Democratic challenger Jaime Harrison to secure his seat in the U.S. Senate. The race was South Carolina's most expensive ever.

Richard Shiro/AP
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham reacts after voting in Seneca, South Carolina, Nov. 3, 2020. Mr. Graham's close relationship with President Donald Trump, who remains popular in South Carolina, played a prominent role in the race.

Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has secured a fourth term in the United States Senate.

The incumbent defeated Democratic challenger Jaime Harrison, an associate chairman of the Democratic National Committee.

Mr. Harrison’s massive fundraising broke records in the race, allowing the challenger to dominate airwaves and mount a significant ground effort. Some polling in the campaign’s closing weeks showed a head-to-head race.

But Mr. Graham mustered support across South Carolina, where all statewide offices are held by Republicans and support for President Donald Trump remains strong.

As chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he occupied a national television platform for days during the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

The competition between Mr. Graham and Mr. Harrison turned into South Carolina’s most expensive race ever, with both candidates posting record fundraising.

Mr. Harrison raised $57 million in the third quarter alone, shattering all quarterly fundraising records for any Senate candidate, amassing a war chest of more than $100 million over the course of the race, becoming the first U.S. Senate candidate ever to do so.

Mr. Graham told The Associated Press late last week he had raised at least $100 million over the course of the race, his third-quarter haul of $28 million being the largest ever posted by a Republican Senate candidate in a quarterly filing period.

Mr. Graham often critiqued Mr. Harrison for relying mostly on out-of-state supporters, who made up about 90% of his donor base. Early on, through relationships forged in part through his standing as associate Democratic National Committee chairman, Mr. Harrison attained a high profile that brought with it small-dollar donors from all over the country, many funneled through Democrats’ ActBlue fundraising portal.

In his pursuit of a fourth term, Mr. Graham also went outside the state for money, with about 86% of his funders living somewhere other than South Carolina. Both candidates, along with third-party groups pouring money into the race, waged nonstop ad campaigns on television and digital spaces that at times left voters fatigued by the content inundating them at every turn.

Mr. Graham’s newly minted close relationship with President Donald Trump played a prominent role in the race, with Mr. Harrison and other critics portraying him as too willing to acquiesce to his former foe, whom he at one time called a “race-baiting, xenophobic, bigot.” Mr. Graham maintained that he felt it in his constituents’ best interests that he align with the president, who has remained popular in South Carolina.

In the race’s closing weeks, Mr. Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court created a dual challenge for Mr. Graham. As chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mr. Graham was tasked with shepherding the confirmation hearings, which began just three weeks before Election Day, as well as fending for his own seat.

Mr. Graham seemed to take the assignment in stride, using some moments to advocate for his ability to represent the needs of his constituents, such as calling the Affordable Care Act “a disaster for the state of South Carolina,” blaming the program for rural hospital closures and advocating instead for a bloc grant program. Mr. Harrison, meanwhile, called out what he saw as Mr. Graham’s hypocrisy on previous opposition to election-year high court appointments and relished having the state much to himself, switching from a largely virtual campaign pushed online due to the pandemic and spending more time holding socially distanced, in-person events.

Tim Orr, an asphalt contractor from Lexington, said he was voting to reelect President Donald Trump after a small business loan and his $1,200 stimulus check helped keep him afloat following the pandemic.

Mr. Orr was less enthusiastic about Mr. Graham, citing his uneven support of Mr. Trump, but didn’t want to throw the race to Mr. Harrison.

“He’s got to be left where he’s at,” he said of Mr. Graham.

Helen Sims who works at a Wal-Mart, cast her ballot for Mr. Harrison on Tuesday, saying Mr. Graham should have helped Americans struggling through the pandemic before prioritizing the Supreme Court hearings. She said Mr. Harrison’s upbringing and his youthful energy will lead to better outcomes for working people.

“We have walked in Jaime’s shoes,” said Ms. Sims, who is Black. “Jaime’s compassionate.”

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Michelle Liu, a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative, contributed to this report from Lexington, South Carolina. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to In South Carolina, Graham defeats Harrison, securing fourth term
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today