Understanding polarization

Susan Walsh/AP
A view of Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Nov. 2, 2020.

If you were to reduce the past 30 years of American elections down to a single word, it might well be one you’d never think of: “sorting.” The dominant trend in American politics during that time has been polarization, but that word alone doesn’t capture what’s going on. America is not just becoming more liberal and more conservative. It is sorting into two distinct identities based on partisan ideology.

Consider the 1960s, for instance. America went through dramatic social change, but Congress was still able to cooperate and pass legislation. Why? One big reason is that, back then, there were liberal Republicans and conservative Democrats. Both tended to pull their parties toward the center, which is where legislation and compromise was born.

Today, that diversity within parties is gone. American voters are increasingly defining themselves by their partisan identity, which now often correlates with everything from religion to race to age to education. For example, the Democratic Party is becoming steadily less religious, more racially diverse, younger, and better educated. The Republican Party is moving in precisely the opposite direction. The result is two clear camps, one liberal and one conservative, with almost nothing in between. The trend is even more pronounced among the most politically active voters, adding to the growing pull toward the extremes.

That puts a different light on these elections, where a record 94 million Americans have already voted. How can an increasingly “sorted” republic find the common ground to govern? Voters will get their say tomorrow.

SOURCE: Pew Research Center, Voteview.com, Common Ground Committee
|
Jacob Turcotte/Staff

Why We Wrote This

Political polarization can seem all-powerful in Washington these days. But the story of how America got here is the story of voters’ changing views of themselves – and how that has reshaped politics.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Understanding polarization
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2020/1102/Understanding-polarization
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe