Climate change gets a spotlight at the US presidential debate

For the first time in a presidential debate, candidates were not asked if they believed in climate change, but rather, what their policies on it would be. Critics have charged in the past that the environmental policy doesn’t feature prominently in debates.

Patrick Semansky/AP
President Donald Trump and Democratic challenger Joe Biden participate in the final presidential debate, Oct. 22, 2020, in Nashville, Tennessee. While climate change featured prominently, some voters are focused on day-to-day concerns like unemployment and COVID-19.

Republican President Donald Trump and Democratic challenger Joe Biden clashed over the United States’ response to climate change in their final presidential debate on Thursday, which included a stark disagreement over the future of the oil industry.

The candidates were asked at their matchup in Nashville, Tennessee, what they would do to combat climate change – the first time in a presidential debate they were not questioned on whether they believed in it or not.

“I do love the environment,” said Mr. Trump, citing a federal program to plant trees and a drop in carbon emissions.

But he said he was not willing to harm businesses in order to help the environment.

Mr. Biden said his plan for a transition to a more climate-friendly economy would create high-paying jobs and boost U.S. businesses.

“Global warming is an existential threat to humanity,” Mr. Biden said. “We have a moral obligation to deal with it and we’re told by all the leading scientists in the world we don’t have much time.”

Mr. Trump, who trails Mr. Biden in national opinion polls ahead of the Nov. 3 election, accused his rival of planning to destroy the oil industry, leading Mr. Biden to respond that he did believe the country should eventually replace oil with solar, wind, and other forms of non-polluting power.

“I would transition from the oil industry, yes,” Mr. Biden said, prompting Mr. Trump to call for voters in states where oil is an important industry to note the former vice president’s stance.

“He is going to destroy the oil industry,” Mr. Trump said. “Will you remember that Texas? Will you remember that Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Ohio?”

Republicans, including former Texas Governor Rick Perry, who served as energy secretary under Mr. Trump, immediately pounced, saying Mr. Biden would kill millions of jobs.

Kendra Horn, a Democratic U.S. representative from Oklahoma seeking re-election, distanced herself from Mr. Biden, saying on Twitter that oil and gas policy is “one of the places Biden and I disagree.”

After the debate, Mr. Biden told reporters he was referring to a plan to stop subsidizing fossil fuels.

“We’re not getting rid of fossil fuels,” Mr. Biden said. “We’re getting of the subsidies for fossil fuels. But we’re not getting rid of fossil fuels for a long time. ... They’re not going to lose their jobs. Besides, a lot more jobs are going to be created in other alternatives.”

Fracking and swing voters

Mr. Trump also accused Mr. Biden of planning to ban hydraulic fracturing, a process of extracting natural gas from shale that is opposed by many environmentalists. Mr. Biden said he would ban fracking on federal land only. Fracking is an issue in western Pennsylvania, a crucial battleground state in the election.

The president mocked a part of Mr. Biden’s climate plan that called for more efficient buildings, saying Mr. Biden would “knock down buildings and build new buildings with little tiny small windows.”

Environmentalists have complained for years that the candidates’ views on climate change have not been emphasized in presidential debates.

But heat waves and wildfires in the Western U.S. and uncommonly powerful storms battering other parts of the country have put climate issues in the spotlight.

For many voters, however, climate has been surpassed by the COVID-19 pandemic, jobs and the economy, and racial justice as issues of top importance in choosing a presidential candidate, Reuters/Ipsos polling shows.

“Climate is a long-term concern, as opposed to joblessness, which is today, or a pandemic, which is today,” said political scientist Larry Sabato, who heads the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Climate change gets a spotlight at the US presidential debate
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today