Virginia judge allows gun range to reopen despite lockdown

In the latest lawsuit challenging Gov. Ralph Northam's emergency powers, Lynchburg Circuit Judge F. Patrick Yeatts says the right to bear arms supersedes the governor's executive order.

Bob Brown/Richmond Times-Dispatch/AP
Gov. Ralph Northam answers a reporter's question during his press briefing in Richmond, Virginia, on April 24, 2020. After the ruling, Mr. Northam said the state will consider its legal options to “promote and protect the health and safety of Virginians."

A Virginia gun range must be allowed to open to customers despite a statewide executive order requiring nonessential businesses to close to slow the spread of the coronavirus, a judge ruled Monday.

The order issued by Lynchburg Circuit Judge F. Patrick Yeatts says federal and state protections on the right to bear arms outweigh any emergency authority held by Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam to order the gun range closed.

The SafeSide gun range in Lynchburg filed the lawsuit challenging the governor's executive order, along with Gun Owners of America, the Virginia Citizens Defense League, and the Association of Virginia Gun Ranges.

Attorney General Mark Herring's office had argued that Mr. Northam's emergency powers to protect public safety during a pandemic should be upheld.

Mr. Herring, a Democrat, said in a statement that his office is analyzing its legal options.

"Governor Northam’s efforts to save lives and slow the spread of COVID-19 are necessary and proving to be effective, but unfortunately, the gun lobby believes the ability to shoot a gun indoors during this pandemic is worth risking further spread of the virus and making Virginia communities and families less safe,” Mr. Herring said.

At a news conference, Mr. Northam also said the state will consider its legal options. He emphasized that his goal is to “promote and protect the health and safety of Virginians. ... No particular business has been singled out.”

Mr. Yeatts, in his ruling, said state law limits the governor's power to regulate guns even in an emergency. He said Virginia's Constitution includes language that parallels almost exactly the Second Amendment.

“The Governor appears to argue that, when he declares a state of emergency, he can ignore any law that limits his power, even laws designed to limit his powers in a state of emergency,” Mr. Yeatts wrote.

Mr. Yeatts granted an injunction that immediately allows the range to open, saying the gun range and its customers would suffer irreparable harm with any delay. In particular, he cited the livelihoods of the range employees and the need of gun owners to train with their weapons. He said closing the range is “especially unsettling for new gun owners with no prior firearm experience.”

Mr. Yeatts said nothing in his order applies to any other aspect of Mr. Northam’s executive order and only applies to the SafeSide Lynchburg facility.

Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, said he is happy the SafeSide range can open, but disappointed the order does not govern gun shops and ranges throughout Virginia. He said his group is talking with lawyers about the best way to get a broader ruling that would apply statewide.

The lawsuit is one of several that have challenged various aspects of Mr. Northam's executive order, but other cases have upheld Mr. Northam's power.

Earlier this month, a judge in southwest Virginia rejected a lawsuit that sought to carve ought a religious exemption to Mr. Northam's executive order.

And in federal court in Alexandria, a Manassas man filed a challenge to the emergency order saying it violated First Amendment protections guaranteeing freedom of assembly. The suit sought an emergency injunction to halt enforcement of the executive order. But U.S District Judge Leonie Brinkema rejected the request, writing that “the only current emergency is the one caused by the coronavirus.”

Another lawsuit filed by a group of fitness centers challenging the governor's authority impose penalties on businesses that violate his executive order is scheduled for a hearing Thursday in Culpeper County.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

Editor’s note: As a public service, the Monitor has removed the paywall for all our coronavirus coverage. It’s free.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.