What Iowa may tell us about Democrats' fight for 'electability'

Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg, and Amy Klobuchar are making the case in Iowa for electability - that they can appeal to moderate American voters.

|
AP Photo/Matt Rourke
Attendees cheer as Democratic presidential candidate former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg speaks during a campaign event Sunday, Feb. 2, 2020, in Coralville, Iowa.

Within the Democrats' sprawling presidential contest is a smaller, yet critical competition among a handful of candidates jockeying to secure the backing of their party's establishment wing.

The first answers come Monday in the Iowa caucuses when voters begin sorting out the fight between progressive candidates, who are arguing for revolutionary change, and more moderate contenders, who many in the party believe have the better chance to defeat President Donald Trump in November.

Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg, and Amy Klobuchar have been making the case in Iowa that they can assemble a broader coalition of voters in states essential to denying Mr. Trump's reelection. Waiting for them on the Super Tuesday primaries in March is Mike Bloomberg, an ideologically similar candidate who is skipping the early contests as he spends hundreds of millions of dollars in larger states.

Their candidacies are rooted in the idea of electability, and a belief that Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are proposing ideas that excite core Democratic voters with sweeping, expensive calls for structural change but would fall well short of winning an electoral majority against the Republican incumbent.

Former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a leading establishment figure, believes Mr. Biden enters the caucuses as the moderate front-runner, even as Mr. McAuliffe acknowledges he has questioned whether the 77-year-old former vice president can sustain his strength.

“I thought hard about running for president. I was concerned Biden was in my space,” Mr. McAuliffe said in an interview. “Part of my calculation was, ‘Could he hold up?' And I have to be honest with you, he has held up. We made the right decision.”

“Iowa will be a real determinant,” Mr. McAuliffe said. “This field will begin to change.”

The unofficial establishment primary will help determine the identity of the Democratic Party in 2020 as it frames the matchup against Mr. Trump. The three top Democrats in Iowa most often considered moderates oppose aggressive progressive priorities such as “Medicare for All,” yet their profiles offer sharply different views of the world.

Mr. Biden is a lifelong politician with working-class roots. The 38-year-old Mr. Buttigieg is a former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, and an openly gay ex-military intelligence officer. Ms. Klobuchar is a 59-year-old three-term Minnesota senator and a former county prosecutor.

In Iowa, the establishment-minded Democrats are working to assemble a coalition of voters that typically skews older, more rural and even includes non-Democrats. Strategists for Mr. Biden, Mr. Buttigieg, and Ms. Klobuchar note they have specifically targeted moderate Republicans over the race's final days.

Ms. Klobuchar's team says she's the only candidate to have campaigned in all of the 31 counties in Iowa that previously backed President Barack Obama but flipped to Mr. Trump in 2016.

“We’re reaching out to our Democratic base but also looking to broaden the tent,” Klobuchar campaign manager Justin Buoen said, pointing to their efforts to win over moderate Democrats, moderate Republicans, and disaffected Trump voters.

Mr. Buttigieg has focused on similar ground in Iowa, especially targeting the eastern cities that once boasted thousands of heavy equipment manufacturing jobs. He has also aggressively campaigned in small towns in the more conservative corners of the state.

Mr. Buttigieg’s campaign acknowledged that Mr. Buttigieg is drawing a contrast with Mr. Biden and Ms. Klobuchar, but disputed any suggestion that he's a centrist candidate. His campaign portrays him as someone pushing for change and is a Washington outsider who defies labels.

“This notion of lanes – progressive, moderate, left, center-left – Pete does not fit into that,” said deputy campaign Manager Hari Sevugan. “This is not about a label on the agenda that he has.”

The stakes are perhaps higher in Iowa for Mr. Buttigieg, who has shown surprising strength against far more experienced candidates. David Axelrod, who served as Mr. Obama's chief strategist, said Mr. Buttigieg must defeat Mr. Biden in Iowa to advance as the preferred moderate in the race.

“If Sanders were to win it and Buttigieg were second, I think Buttigieg is still in the hunt,” Mr. Axelrod said.

Mr. Biden has also focused his schedule over the past two months on rural and small-town Iowa, along with the more industrialized river towns of the eastern edge of the state. His ideal coalition, advisers say, would be a combination of working-class, noncollege educated voters, moderate Catholics, and part of Iowa’s small but growing minority population, plus a smattering of independents and disaffected Republicans.

The campaign has leaned heavily into Mr. Biden’s electability argument, complete with endorsers such as former Secretary of State John Kerry, who won the Iowa caucuses in 2004, former Gov. Tom Vilsack, and the state’s two first-term congresswomen.

Mr. Biden's campaign has also tried to capitalize on attacks from Republicans in and out of the state – including Mr. Trump and Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst – who are trying to undermine his campaign by raising questions about Mr. Biden's family during Mr. Trump's impeachment trial. Mr. Biden and his allies insist that the baseless allegations of corruption are evidence that the Republican Party is afraid to face him in a general election.

Each of the candidates has weaknesses, although Mr. Biden's have been glaring in recent days.

Mr. Biden finished the last fundraising quarter with millions of dollars less than most of his top tier rivals, although he finished the year with twice as much as Ms. Klobuchar in the bank.

He closed out the final week of caucus campaign with noticeably smaller, older, and less energetic crowds than his rivals. On Friday night in Mount Pleasant, only around 80 people showed up for one appearance, roughly the same number drawn to see him in Ottumwa the night before. Both areas are home to the very white working-class voters that Mr. Biden counts as his base, and Mr. Vilsack was once mayor of Mount Pleasant.

Over the course of Thursday and Friday, his crowds never numbered more than 200, even as Mr. Buttigieg turned out three times that amount on some of his stops. By Saturday, Mr. Biden's crowds had begun to grow in size and energy, but they were still considerably smaller than his rivals'.

Mr. Biden's team has refused to predict victory despite polls showing him at or near the top of the field. Instead, aides believe he simply needs to finish in a cluster of candidates near the top.

In a memo to supporters released Friday, Mr. Biden's campaign manager Greg Schultz noted that, “Monday’s contest begins the process, it doesn’t end it.”

Meanwhile, the voters who will decide the contest aren't sure what to do.

Karen and David Scudiero, from North Liberty, are Republicans who say their party has abandoned them. They’re ready to vote for virtually anyone the Democrats run against Mr. Trump.

They say Mr. Biden and Ms. Klobuchar most closely align with their views on issues such as college affordability and health care.

David Scudiero, 66, left a Biden event Saturday still undecided, but leaning toward the former vice president. “I see him being able to work with other people,” he said.

His wife, Karen, was less certain. She felt Mr. Biden’s energy level was low.

“I’m having a tough time with his age, I’ll be honest. He looked older than I expected him to look," she said. "I can’t – his policies are great. It’s not big change. But I wrestle with that in my mind. Do we need big change? Or do we need little changes around the edges?"

This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP writers Alexandra Jaffe, Bill Barrow, Brian Slodysko, and Kathleen Hennessey contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What Iowa may tell us about Democrats' fight for 'electability'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2020/0202/What-Iowa-may-tell-us-about-Democrats-fight-for-electability
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe