Former Trump aide agrees to judiciary interview

Former White House communication director Hope Hicks has agreed to meet with the House Judiciary Committee on June 19, 2019. The committee subpoenaed Ms. Hicks as part of its investigation into Robert Mueller's report and obstruction of justice.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File
Hope Hicks arrives to a closed-door meeting with the House Intelligence Committee at the Capitol in Washington, on Feb. 27, 2018 while serving as White House Communication Director. Ms. Hicks has agreed to meet with the House Judiciary Committee in a closed-door meeting about former special counsel Robert Mueller's report.

Former White House communications director Hope Hicks has agreed to a closed-door interview with the House Judiciary Committee, the panel announced Wednesday, a breakthrough for Democrats who have been frustrated by President Donald Trump's broad stonewalling of their investigations.

The Judiciary panel subpoenaed Ms. Hicks, a close and trusted Trump aide who worked for the presidential campaign and in the White House, last month as part of its investigation into special counsel Robert Mueller's report and obstruction of justice. Her June 19 interview will mark the first time a former Trump aide has testified before the panel as part of its probe.

Ms. Hicks was a key witness for Mr. Mueller, delivering important information to the special counsel's office about multiple episodes involving the president. That includes the president's role in the drafting of a misleading and incomplete statement about a 2016 Trump Tower meeting at which Donald Trump Jr. expected to receive dirt on Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Ms. Hicks and another former White House aide, Annie Donaldson, both defied subpoenas last week to provide documents to the committee after the White House directed them not to cooperate. That came after former White House counsel Don McGahn also defied subpoenas for documents and testimony at the direction of the White House. Mr. McGahn was mentioned frequently in Mr. Mueller's report, in addition to Ms. Donaldson, who was his aide.

It is unclear whether Ms. Hicks will decline to answer some questions related to her time in the White House. She has so far declined to release any documents related to that period after the White House said she had no legal right to provide them. But she has turned over documents related to her time on the Trump campaign.

An attorney for Ms. Hicks declined to comment.

While the interview will be behind closed doors, the committee chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the interview transcript will be released to the public.

"It is important to hear from Ms. Hicks, who was a key witness for the special counsel," Mr. Nadler said. "Ms. Hicks understands that the committee will be free to pose questions as it sees fit."

Democrats hope that Ms. Hicks' interview will be the first of many related to Mr. Mueller's report. They are expected to go to court soon to enforce a subpoena against Mr. McGahn, and negotiations are ongoing for Mr. Mueller's own testimony. Mr. Mueller has made it clear that he doesn't want to testify and will not go beyond the substance of the report in any questioning, but Democrats want to talk to him anyway.

Mr. Nadler said Tuesday that he also hopes to call in Jody Hunt, who served as former Attorney General Jeff Sessions' chief of staff, and former White House aide Rick Dearborn.

Absent key witnesses, Democrats have so far held hearings with issue experts to review Mr. Mueller's report, which examined Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether Mr. Trump obstructed justice as he tried to undermine the probe.

On Wednesday, the House intelligence panel heard from former FBI officials who told lawmakers that Russian meddling in the 2016 election bore some of the textbook tricks of the trade of Kremlin spycraft, including the volume and breadth of contacts with Mr. Trump associates.

After that hearing, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., threatened to subpoena FBI Director Christopher Wray for information related to the bureau's counterintelligence investigation into the Russian interference.

Mr. Schiff said he has unsuccessfully sought more information about that investigation and any links to Mr. Trump's campaign, including whether that probe is still active. The investigation was first disclosed by then-FBI Director James Comey at a committee hearing in March 2017, and Mr. Schiff said he has received few answers about it since Mr. Comey was fired by Mr. Trump two months later.

Mr. Schiff wants to know whether the FBI is still conducting any related counterintelligence investigations. Such inquiries can take years and extend far beyond a criminal probe.

"We are determined to get answers, and we are running out of patience," Mr. Schiff said. "If necessary, we'll subpoena the director and require him to come in and provide those answers under oath."

The two FBI witnesses at the hearing, Robert Anderson and Stephanie Douglas, highlighted aspects of the Mueller report they said showed Russian efforts to screen and test Trump campaign associates, to establish backchannels of communications and to spread their contacts around in hopes of maximizing their chances of getting what they wanted.

Mr. Mueller did not find a criminal conspiracy between the campaign and Russia, but he did detail a series of interactions and outreach that has alarmed Democrats and accelerated calls from some in the party for impeachment proceedings and renewed investigations.

Also Wednesday, Mr. Trump Jr. spoke with the Senate Intelligence Committee for about three hours to clarify an interview with the committee's staff in 2017. Senators wanted to talk to him again about the Trump Tower meeting with a Russian lawyer and a Trump real estate project in Moscow.

The president's former lawyer, Michael Cohen, told a House committee in February that he had briefed Mr. Trump Jr. approximately 10 times about a plan to build a Trump Tower in Moscow before the 2016 election. But Mr. Trump Jr. had told Congress he was only "peripherally aware" of the real estate proposal.

As he left the interview, Mr. Trump Jr. said he was happy to clarify his answers, but added, "I don't think I changed any of what I said because there was nothing to change."

This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP writers Lisa Mascaro and Laurie Kellman contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Former Trump aide agrees to judiciary interview
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today